2015
DOI: 10.3280/scre2015-003006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La stima e l'interpretazione dei divari regionali nel lungo periodo: i risultati principali e alcune tracce di ricerca

Abstract: La stima e l'interpretazione dei divari regionali nel lungo periodo: i risultati principali e alcune tracce di ricerca Versione preliminare. Non citare senza il consenso dell'autore AbstractIl saggio analizza i principali risultati nella ricostruzione del Pil delle regioni italiane e dà conto dell'interpretazione sull'andamento dei divari che ne risulta. Le più aggiornate stime del Pil regionale, per intervalli decennali dal 1871 al 1951, ai confini storici e attuali, vengono presentate e discusse, e nuove pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this first wave of industrialization is worth our attention for several reasons. According to Felice (2015a), in spite of the limited growth experienced by the country between its Unification and Second World War (with only a doubling of its GDP per capita), the dynamics taking place in this period created the premises for the economic boom started in the 1950s. From a more pragmatic perspective, studying the period immediately after Unification and before the Fascist rule presents several advantages: all internal borders and tariffs were removed and the administrative and legal framework became the same for all regions, making them more comparable across periods.…”
Section: Historical Background and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this first wave of industrialization is worth our attention for several reasons. According to Felice (2015a), in spite of the limited growth experienced by the country between its Unification and Second World War (with only a doubling of its GDP per capita), the dynamics taking place in this period created the premises for the economic boom started in the 1950s. From a more pragmatic perspective, studying the period immediately after Unification and before the Fascist rule presents several advantages: all internal borders and tariffs were removed and the administrative and legal framework became the same for all regions, making them more comparable across periods.…”
Section: Historical Background and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a positive relationship between height has been noticed across Spanish regions over the period 1934-1973, and across Italian regions from the years after 1871 (Cámara and Garcia-Roman 2015; A'Hearn and Vecchi 2017a). For Italy, regional GDP per capita in 1871, estimated by Felice (2015), is significantly related to the average height of conscripts born in the same year ( r = 0.62). However, due to the lack of data on production per sector, regional GDP estimates for the first post-unitarian decades present wide margins of uncertainty.…”
Section: Regional Differences In Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the margin of uncertainty, the estimates of GDP per capita suggest that, in the first post-unification decades, the gap between the centre-north and the south was modest (Daniele and Malanima 2011). For 1871, the difference in GDP per capita between the two areas was estimated at about 10-15 per cent (Felice 2015; Felice and Vasta 2015). Data on infant mortality and life expectancy at birth, as well as estimates on nutritional conditions, do not indicate significant north-south differences in the first decade after unification, except for education levels (Vecchi and Coppola 2006; Atella et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Italy has significant territorial differences [26] attributable, in addition to the dual pattern of the North South divide [27,28], to the imbalanced development between cities and rural areas [29,30], between plains and mountains [31], between coastal and inner areas [32], and between centers and inner areas [1,33]. These territorial differences are then reflected in inequality [34][35][36], which may depend on the presence and differentiated access to resources-economic, social, and environmental-and to the services offered in a certain territory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%