1985
DOI: 10.3406/globe.1985.1210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La "siepe" nei dialetti friulani ed Alpini Orientali

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolation by distance or natural selection due to a single factor cannot be invoked to explain the present results, chiefly because the principal-components method is not suitable to appreciate them [8,11,12], It has recently been demonstrated that some analogies exist between languages and genes [ 13] in Europe [14], including Italy [15], If we consider the classification of living dia lects spoken in central Italy [16], we can see that there is no positive association with our clusters since, for example, the dialect spoken in LI and PI belongs to a group different from that of TR, and PS is included in an area with a different dialect to that spoken in MC, AP and AN. The clusters obtained in the present study, instead, may reflect a distinction be tween a Tyrrhenian and an Adriatic area which is possible on the basis of both geogra phy, corresponding to the Apennine wa tershed, and 'dead' languages, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolation by distance or natural selection due to a single factor cannot be invoked to explain the present results, chiefly because the principal-components method is not suitable to appreciate them [8,11,12], It has recently been demonstrated that some analogies exist between languages and genes [ 13] in Europe [14], including Italy [15], If we consider the classification of living dia lects spoken in central Italy [16], we can see that there is no positive association with our clusters since, for example, the dialect spoken in LI and PI belongs to a group different from that of TR, and PS is included in an area with a different dialect to that spoken in MC, AP and AN. The clusters obtained in the present study, instead, may reflect a distinction be tween a Tyrrhenian and an Adriatic area which is possible on the basis of both geogra phy, corresponding to the Apennine wa tershed, and 'dead' languages, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%