2016
DOI: 10.17118/11143/8815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La recherche-action et la recherche-développement au service de la littératie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the verbatim transcripts, a thematic content analysis was conducted by members of the research team trained in the qualitative approach (Paillé & Mucchielli, 2012). Ten percent (10%) of the interviews were co-coded to meet scienti c criteria (Bouregois, 2016). Iterative co-coding meetings allowed for a consensus to be reached on the coding grid and de nitions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the verbatim transcripts, a thematic content analysis was conducted by members of the research team trained in the qualitative approach (Paillé & Mucchielli, 2012). Ten percent (10%) of the interviews were co-coded to meet scienti c criteria (Bouregois, 2016). Iterative co-coding meetings allowed for a consensus to be reached on the coding grid and de nitions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les modèles MNESIS (Eustache & Desgranges, 2008), ainsi que ceux de Norman et Shallice (1986), de Posner (1980) et de Rothi, Ochipa, et Heilman (1997) ont servi à analyser les difficultés cognitives décrites par les proches aidants. Pour rencontrer les critères de scientificité (Bourgeois, 2016), dix pour cent des entrevues ont été co-codées. De façon itérative pendant la cocodification des premières entrevues, des réunions de consensus ont permis de préciser la grille de codification et la définition des codes.…”
Section: Méthodologieunclassified