La mise en valeur d’un ancien site éponyme : Eger-Kőporos dans le Paléolithique moyen et supérieur de la Hongrie du nord

Demjén-Szőlő-hegy III korai felső paleolit lelőhely

“…Analógiaként az Eger-Kőporos-tető és az Egerszalók-kővágó-dűlő lelőhelyeken Janusz Kozłowski által kimutatott korai felső paleolit ipar szolgálhat (ún. Macrolaminaire ipar), amely a fenti lelőhelyeken más korszakok anyagával keverve jelenik meg, területileg nem elkülöníthető formában (Kozłowski et al, 2009;Kozłowski et al, 2012). A Szőlő-hegy II lelőhelyen a régészeti anyag viszonylag homogénnek mutatkozik, de a leletanyagban, néhány darab erejéig előforduló bifaciálisok kérdése egyelőre megoldatlan.…”

The problems of the Szeletian as seen from Hungary

“…Vértes (1965, (2005,55,(59)(60) listed 13 localities related to the Jankovichian, 4 to the Early Szeletian, and 7 to the Developed Szeletian, as well as 8 open-air sites where leafpoints have been found with uncertain cultural affiliation. Due to systematic field surveys carried out by amateurs and young researchers from the late 1990s onwards (Mester 2014c), a great number of open-air sites have been discovered or re-discovered on the territory of the North Hungarian Range (Gutay 2007;Markó 2009;Zandler 2012;Péntek, Zandler 2013;2014;2017;Zandler, Béres 2014;Péntek 2015a;2015b). Some of them were also excavated (Kozłowski et al 2009;2012;Chu et al 2018).…”

The Chronostratigraphy of the Aurignacian in the Northern Carpathian Basin Based on New Chronometric/Archeological Data from Seňa I (Eastern Slovakia)

“…In the Bükk Mountains, recent attempts to clarify the age estimates and cultural successions of the famous Szeleta, Istállós-kő, and Pes-kő caves have highlighted a scarcity of diagnostic artifacts, a poor understanding of stratigraphies, and difficulties in producing meaningful numerical chronologies (Bánesz 1989;Davies and Hedges 2008;Hauck et al 2016;Lengyel and Mester 2008;Markó 2015;Patou-Mathis et al 2016). In the surrounding landscape, open-air sites are known in and around the North Hungarian Range but are mostly unstratified, and secure radiometric ages are still unknown (Dobosi 1995(Dobosi , 2013Kozłowski et al 2009;Kozłowski et al 2012;Lengyel et al 2006;Markó et al 2002). In nearby northwestern Romania (c. 175 km southeast), reexaminations of the sites of Boinești, Bușag, Călinești, and Remetea Șomoș I & II suggest that, while there may be Aurignacian artifacts in the assemblages (Anghelinu and Niţă 2014;Dobrescu 2008), they have been reworked with Mousterian and Gravettian elements and therefore cannot be confidently separated and dated (Tuffreau et al 2013).…”