2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2014.10.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La fièvre Ebola : organisation de la riposte et hantise au Sénégal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This predominance of lymph node location had already been reported in Tunisian [13] and Senegalese [12] series. However, the predominance of serous localizations, mainly peritoneal in our series and in the Senegalese series of Diop et al [8], could be explained by the predominant gastroenterological orientation of these internal medicine departments.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This predominance of lymph node location had already been reported in Tunisian [13] and Senegalese [12] series. However, the predominance of serous localizations, mainly peritoneal in our series and in the Senegalese series of Diop et al [8], could be explained by the predominant gastroenterological orientation of these internal medicine departments.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Thus, Nganda et al [7] in the Congo estimated it at 51.8% of all forms of tuberculosis. In Senegal, Diop et al [8] reported 12.7% of extra-pulmonary forms among 824 cases of tuberculosis collected in the Thiès health district. Senegalese epidemiological data from 2009 and 2018 reported extra-pulmonary forms in 14% of 12,836 cases of tuberculosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across health posts nationally, 67.9% had GPS coverage; such comparatively low coverage was largely skewed by Dakar, where only 32.5% of facilities designated as health posts had GPS coordinates. This is likely associated with the high prevalence of private clinics in Dakar, 31 for which more granular facility information can be more challenging to access. Outside of Dakar, GPS coverage ranged from 91.9% in Saint-Louis to 72.8% in Tambacounda; it is worth noting that the lower GPS coverage for Tambacounda is likely associated with the inclusion of a non-geolocated regional facility list of health centers, health posts, and health huts for 2022.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is at least partly due to the composition of available facility data inputs (i.e., several data inputs included only public facilities), as well as higher missingness or non-reporting of GPS among private facilities in facility surveys. We sought to derive GPS locations based on facility addresses provided through a 2016-2017 assessment of private facilities in Senegal; 31 however, nearly all of the addresses included insufficient information for Google-based tools to appropriately assign reasonable GPS coordinates. Progress toward a full MFL with GPS will require improving the health data landscape for the private sector, particularly in areas with a higher prevalence of private health service delivery (e.g., Dakar).…”
Section: Usage Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%