1980
DOI: 10.3406/ahrf.1980.4377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La féodalité et la Révolution française : seigneurie et communauté paysanne (1780-1799)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alongside the tradition of peasant communalism in the ancien regime, stressed in Marxist historiography (52), there existed also a tradition of hierarchical solidarity between seigneurs and peasantry against royal power. Again, there is well-known evidence of crosssectional regional variation, and of variation within regions over time, in the organized expression of hierarchical solidarity (53), but and popular sedition in seventeenth-century it may be significant that one of the centers of counter-revolution, Brittany, was also a region where seigneurial levies were a relatively high proportion of seigneurial revenue (up to 55 %) (54). While this information is itself insufficient, since we need evidence of the relationship of levies to peasant revenue before assessing the burden of levies on the peasantry, it is still suggestive.…”
Section: Peasant Solidarity and Just Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside the tradition of peasant communalism in the ancien regime, stressed in Marxist historiography (52), there existed also a tradition of hierarchical solidarity between seigneurs and peasantry against royal power. Again, there is well-known evidence of crosssectional regional variation, and of variation within regions over time, in the organized expression of hierarchical solidarity (53), but and popular sedition in seventeenth-century it may be significant that one of the centers of counter-revolution, Brittany, was also a region where seigneurial levies were a relatively high proportion of seigneurial revenue (up to 55 %) (54). While this information is itself insufficient, since we need evidence of the relationship of levies to peasant revenue before assessing the burden of levies on the peasantry, it is still suggestive.…”
Section: Peasant Solidarity and Just Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%