2021
DOI: 10.15517/aeca.v47i0.47644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La feminización de los derechos migratorios: Mujeres activistas y una visión feminista para la protección de las personas migrantes de Centroamérica

Abstract: El propósito de este artículo es analizar el pensamiento de varias mujeres en Centroamérica que lideran proyectos para disminuir la vulnerabilidad de las personas migrantes y fortalecer su bienestar. Este análisis se centra en una muestra de 17 entrevistas realizadas entre 2016 y 2017 por el Instituto Hemisférico de la Universidad de Nueva York. El argumento principal es que estas iniciativas están contribuyendo a crear una visión feminista para el futuro de las políticas migratorias. En particular, este pensa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Today’s Central American liberatory movements may not be as well-known or well-understood in the United States as their predecessors four decades ago. However, as is indicated by much of the recent overlapping scholarship dealing with contemporary Central American social struggles (e.g., Almeida, 2014; Ybarra, 2017; Shipley, 2017; Broad and Cavanagh, 2022; Nolin and Russell, 2021; Frank, 2018; Roux and Geglia, 2019; Phillips, 2015; Fúnez-Flores, 2020; Sagot Rodríguez, 2012; Murcia, 2020; Barahona, 2018; Díaz Arias and Viales-Hurtado, 2021; Velásquez Nimatuj, 2005; Burrell and Moodie, 2020; Manz, 2008; Pine, 2013) and analyzing regional and broader processes of human mobility in the neoliberal context (e.g., Chomsky, 2022; Stoll, 2012; McGuirk and Pine, 2020; Walia, Estes, and Kelley, 2021; Miller, 2017; Pérez-Rocha, 2021; Díaz-Barriga and Dorsey, 2020; Dahlstrom, Loor, and Sherman-Stokes, 2019; Holmes, 2013; Mendiola, 2021; Menjívar and Walsh, 2019; Coutin, 2010; Frank-Vitale and Martínez d’Aubuisson, 2020; Hanlon and Nolin, 2021; Burrell and Moodie, 2019; Castillo, 2019; Garibo García and Call, 2020), many of them are arguably operating in even more hostile territory.…”
Section: “Root Causes”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today’s Central American liberatory movements may not be as well-known or well-understood in the United States as their predecessors four decades ago. However, as is indicated by much of the recent overlapping scholarship dealing with contemporary Central American social struggles (e.g., Almeida, 2014; Ybarra, 2017; Shipley, 2017; Broad and Cavanagh, 2022; Nolin and Russell, 2021; Frank, 2018; Roux and Geglia, 2019; Phillips, 2015; Fúnez-Flores, 2020; Sagot Rodríguez, 2012; Murcia, 2020; Barahona, 2018; Díaz Arias and Viales-Hurtado, 2021; Velásquez Nimatuj, 2005; Burrell and Moodie, 2020; Manz, 2008; Pine, 2013) and analyzing regional and broader processes of human mobility in the neoliberal context (e.g., Chomsky, 2022; Stoll, 2012; McGuirk and Pine, 2020; Walia, Estes, and Kelley, 2021; Miller, 2017; Pérez-Rocha, 2021; Díaz-Barriga and Dorsey, 2020; Dahlstrom, Loor, and Sherman-Stokes, 2019; Holmes, 2013; Mendiola, 2021; Menjívar and Walsh, 2019; Coutin, 2010; Frank-Vitale and Martínez d’Aubuisson, 2020; Hanlon and Nolin, 2021; Burrell and Moodie, 2019; Castillo, 2019; Garibo García and Call, 2020), many of them are arguably operating in even more hostile territory.…”
Section: “Root Causes”mentioning
confidence: 99%