2019
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-759020190503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La Felicidad en El Trabajo: Validación De Una Escala De Medida

Abstract: RESUMEN La felicidad del trabajador es un factor determinante de su eficiencia a corto y a largo plazo. En la literatura encontramos intentos de medir dicha felicidad directamente, y otros centrados en conocer cuáles son los elementos que generan esta felicidad. El presente trabajo realiza el análisis de validez de una escala propuesta por Del Junco, Espasandín, Dutschke y Palacios (2013) en la que se exponen factores determinantes de la felicidad del trabajador. El trabajo aporta una guía para la validación d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The subsequent methodology suggests an indirect effect of individual HRM practices and, additionally, the heap of HRM outcomes (employee commitment) on organizational performance, as indicated by Wright et al (Wright, Gardner, & Moynihan, 2003). Among all HRM practices discussed above, we selected empowerment and compensation practices as candidates to test their direct and indirect impacts on organizational performance as initially proposed by Herzberg (1959) and Hackman and Oldham (1980) and widely tested in subsequent research (Mehrjouyan, 2019;Ramirez-Garcia, Perea, & Junco, 2019;Teems & Helbing, 2017;Tholath & Thattil, 2016;Wang, Liu, & Zhu, 2018). These two practices show the fundamental difference between managers' and employees thinking.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsequent methodology suggests an indirect effect of individual HRM practices and, additionally, the heap of HRM outcomes (employee commitment) on organizational performance, as indicated by Wright et al (Wright, Gardner, & Moynihan, 2003). Among all HRM practices discussed above, we selected empowerment and compensation practices as candidates to test their direct and indirect impacts on organizational performance as initially proposed by Herzberg (1959) and Hackman and Oldham (1980) and widely tested in subsequent research (Mehrjouyan, 2019;Ramirez-Garcia, Perea, & Junco, 2019;Teems & Helbing, 2017;Tholath & Thattil, 2016;Wang, Liu, & Zhu, 2018). These two practices show the fundamental difference between managers' and employees thinking.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (α) reliability in the present study was .83 for attention, .76 for clarity, and .86 for repair. (Ramírez-García et al, 2019). This scale, developed in Spain, has 11 items which use a Likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree).…”
Section: Trait Meta-mood Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsequent methodology suggests an indirect effect of individual HRM practices and the heap of HRM outcomes (employee commitment) on organizational performance, as indicated by Wright, Gardner, and Moynihan (2003). Among all HRM practices discussed above, we selected empowerment and compensation practices as candidates to test their direct and indirect impacts on organizational performance as initially proposed by Herzberg, Mausner, and Snyderman (1959) and Hackman (1980) widely tested in subsequent research (Mehrjouyan, 2019;Ramirez-Garcia, Perea, & Junco, 2019;Tholath & Thattil, 2016;Wang, Liu, & Zhu, 2018). These two practices show the fundamental difference between managers' and employees' think.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%