2019
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2019.1627188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La Charla: documenting the experience of unaccompanied minors in immigration court

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…56 Reports of physical, verbal, and sexual abuse from border enforcement officials 3,66,68 are coupled with detention conditions that explicitly violate human rights. 56,68 Prolonged detention is justified on the grounds of unavailable child welfare spaces, flight risk (ie, leaving the country before a trial hearing), or age determination disputes, with conditions such as sleep deprivation, inadequate food or water, and denied medical care being common. 69 Interviews with asylum officers can be frightening and confusing (eg, there might be language barriers or no access to translators), and children might not be recognised as minors unless they have age confirmation.…”
Section: Destinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…56 Reports of physical, verbal, and sexual abuse from border enforcement officials 3,66,68 are coupled with detention conditions that explicitly violate human rights. 56,68 Prolonged detention is justified on the grounds of unavailable child welfare spaces, flight risk (ie, leaving the country before a trial hearing), or age determination disputes, with conditions such as sleep deprivation, inadequate food or water, and denied medical care being common. 69 Interviews with asylum officers can be frightening and confusing (eg, there might be language barriers or no access to translators), and children might not be recognised as minors unless they have age confirmation.…”
Section: Destinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In destination countries, there is often tension between border enforcement, which criminalises irregular migration, and a child rights-based assessment of health needs( 56 ). Reports of physical, verbal and sexual abuse from border enforcement officials( 3 , 66 , 68 ) are coupled with detention conditions in explicit violation of human rights( 56 , 68 ). Prolonged detention is justified on the grounds of unavailable child welfare spaces, ‘flight risk’ or age determination dispute, with conditions such as sleep deprivation, inadequate food or water and denied medical care( 69 ).…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All resettled UMs—including toddlers and infants— are expected to eventually appear in immigration court regardless of age or whether they have been able to secure legal representation or counsel. While the courts provide interpreters, the challenges posed to children to “articulate their claims before a judge and lawyer in a language and culture [that is] not their own” are immense (Huynh, 2021, p. 617).…”
Section: Contextual Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%