2021
DOI: 10.14201/teri.23672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La autoevaluación del estudiante universitario: revisión de la literatura

Abstract: La Declaración de Bolonia de 1999 impulsó diferentes cambios en la educación superior en Europa y en el mundo, entre los cuales fue la transformación de la evaluación de los aprendizajes. Por lo tanto, la autoevaluación ha sido considerada una de las vías de innovar el proceso evaluativo. Las investigaciones realizadas sobre ella se han centrado principalmente en analizar sus ventajas y desventajas y en comparar las calificaciones del estudiante y el profesor. Así, el objetivo del presente estudio consistió en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not all the students who self-regulated well performed excellently, we cannot ignore the fact that making them more aware of the quality of their performance is itself one of the objectives of education for undergraduate students (ANECA 2004;González & Wagenaar 2003). In addition, the students perceived the experience as positive, with more advantages than disadvantages, which contradicts some experiences reported by Kambourova, González-Agudelo & Grisales-Franco (2021) of students who perceived their self-assessment efforts as excessive or as outweighing the benefits of the technique. For this reason, the university teachers who participated in this study feel motivated to continue implementing the use of digital follow-up questionnaires as an improvement in teaching practice, to promote selfregulation of student learning and encourage a more objective self-assessment of their academic performance, and as a tool to balance teaching guidance with self-regulated learning.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Although not all the students who self-regulated well performed excellently, we cannot ignore the fact that making them more aware of the quality of their performance is itself one of the objectives of education for undergraduate students (ANECA 2004;González & Wagenaar 2003). In addition, the students perceived the experience as positive, with more advantages than disadvantages, which contradicts some experiences reported by Kambourova, González-Agudelo & Grisales-Franco (2021) of students who perceived their self-assessment efforts as excessive or as outweighing the benefits of the technique. For this reason, the university teachers who participated in this study feel motivated to continue implementing the use of digital follow-up questionnaires as an improvement in teaching practice, to promote selfregulation of student learning and encourage a more objective self-assessment of their academic performance, and as a tool to balance teaching guidance with self-regulated learning.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%