2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2015.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L2 development during study abroad in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much research on the linguistic benefits of SA has examined the development of L2 oral production abilities. This research has found positive effects of SA for overall proficiency (e.g., Di Silvio, Diao, & Donovan, 2016; Segalowitz & Freed, 2004), fluency (e.g., Kim et al., 2015), pronunciation (e.g., Díaz–Campos, 2004; Lord, 2006), and lexical complexity and richness (e.g., Kim et al., 2015; Serrano, Tragant, & Llanes, 2012). Another facet of L2 oral production abilities that has been examined, but has yielded less uniform results, is grammatical accuracy, with some studies showing improvement (e.g., Isabelli & Nishida, 2005; Serrano et al., 2012) and others finding no significant effects (e.g., Collentine, 2004; DeKeyser, 2010).…”
Section: Linguistic Development During Samentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Much research on the linguistic benefits of SA has examined the development of L2 oral production abilities. This research has found positive effects of SA for overall proficiency (e.g., Di Silvio, Diao, & Donovan, 2016; Segalowitz & Freed, 2004), fluency (e.g., Kim et al., 2015), pronunciation (e.g., Díaz–Campos, 2004; Lord, 2006), and lexical complexity and richness (e.g., Kim et al., 2015; Serrano, Tragant, & Llanes, 2012). Another facet of L2 oral production abilities that has been examined, but has yielded less uniform results, is grammatical accuracy, with some studies showing improvement (e.g., Isabelli & Nishida, 2005; Serrano et al., 2012) and others finding no significant effects (e.g., Collentine, 2004; DeKeyser, 2010).…”
Section: Linguistic Development During Samentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, there was no change over time with regard to phonation time ratio (time speaking/total time including pausing). Kim et al (2015) investigated Chinese L2 learners (English L1) before and after a semester in China and found significant improvements in speech rate (words/minute) and mean silent pause length. Interestingly, learners produced significantly more filled and silent pauses per minute at the posttest, but the authors do not comment on potential reasons for these changes.…”
Section: Fluency and Study Abroadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RESEARCH INVESTIGATING LANGUAGE learning during residence/study abroad has shown that time abroad does not lead to equal improvement in all areas of language (Collentine, 2009;Kinginger, 2009;Llanes, 2011). One of the most consistent results has been that the largest gains are found in the area of oral fluency (Du, 2013;Freed, 1995;Kim et al, 2015;Mora & Valls-Ferrer, 2012;Towell, Hawkins, & Bazergui, 1996). When context of learning is compared-for example, study abroad and at-home instruction-study abroad learners typically make significantly more gains in fluency than at-home learners receiving traditional instruction (Freed, Segalowitz, & Dewey, 2004; The Modern Language Journal, 101, 2, (2017) DOI: 10.1111/modl.12395 0026-7902/17/275-293 $1.50/0 C 2017 The Modern Language Journal Serrano, Llanes, & Tragant, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on sub-measures of oral improvements within the different segments of the OPI, to indicate potential task differences. Kim et al (2015) provided rich data on fluency among other aspects of linguistic development, based on computerised OPI tests, finding faster speech rate and shorter pauses among a cohort of 22 US students after a 16-week semester stay in China. However, again the OPI data were not broken down for possible within-task variation.…”
Section: Fluency During Samentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound files were transcribed using CHAT (MacWhinney, 2000), then analysed further using CLAN or PRAAT software (Boersma & Weenink, 2014). Given the complex nature of analysing Mandarin word boundaries (Du, 2013;Kim et al, 2015;Li & Yang, 2009), we follow Kim et al (2015) in calculating single characters as equal to a syllable, and report all our measures as characters per second. In view of the limited sample size, non-parametric inferential analysis was used; all resulting measures were analysed using SPSS.…”
Section: Task 4 Was An Open Conversation Discussing What the Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%