2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2022.102726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L2 comprehension of filled pauses and fillers in unscripted speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Learners might be categorized as proficient learners due to the effective usage of fillers as a part of communication strategies [40]. This shows about their progress in speaking [41], [42]. Fillers as a part of communication strategies are very essential to give good impacts [43] to learners in communication [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learners might be categorized as proficient learners due to the effective usage of fillers as a part of communication strategies [40]. This shows about their progress in speaking [41], [42]. Fillers as a part of communication strategies are very essential to give good impacts [43] to learners in communication [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entre brechas posibles, cabe destacar que los estudios realizados no han tendido a examinar la generación de inferencias causales durante la comprensión del discurso hablado espontáneo. Esto representa una limitación, dado que los procesos cognitivos involucrados en la comprensión del discurso hablado incluyen, por ejemplo, procesar marcadores del discurso conversacionales y errores del habla (tales como reparaciones, o pausas marcadas, Carney, 2022), las cuales no requieren ser procesadas durante la comprensión del discurso escrito. En relación con esto, estudios preliminares sugieren que la presencia de marcadores del discurso ('pero') facilita la generación de inferencias de restablecimiento (Cevasco, 2009).…”
Section: Brechas En La Investigación Acerca Del Modelo Y Futuras Dire...unclassified
“…Carney (2022) pointed out that despite researchers generally agreeing that FPs (including fillers such as like) do not add propositional content to utterances (and are not real words as discussed in the previous subsection), they are not meaningless and can still serve several functions for both listeners and speakers (Carney, 2022;Clark & Fox Tree, 2002;Götz, 2013;Gilquin, 2008). However, L2 listening research has yielded mixed findings about whether FPs support (e.g., THEORY AND PRACTICE IN LANGUAGE STUDIES Blau, 1991) or hinder L2 listening (e.g., Griffiths, 1991).…”
Section: (B) the Functions Of Fpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, L2 listening research has yielded mixed findings about whether FPs support (e.g., THEORY AND PRACTICE IN LANGUAGE STUDIES Blau, 1991) or hinder L2 listening (e.g., Griffiths, 1991). In a recent study of Japanese undergraduate students listening to unscripted English narrative texts on video, Carney (2022) found that, as revealed by L1 recall, verbal reports, and repetitive data tasks, the FP um may cause trouble during L2 listening comprehension regardless of the L2 learners' proficiency (many of their participants mislistened to um and heard it as am when it occurred between I and had in an utterance). Carney (2022) attributed this misinterpretation to the position of the FP um, especially when it occurred within intonation units, making um perceptually ambiguous when lexical items surrounded it but not when it occurred at syntactic boundaries of utterances.…”
Section: (B) the Functions Of Fpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation