1996
DOI: 10.1006/jdeq.1996.0155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L1-Contraction and Uniqueness for Quasilinear Elliptic–Parabolic Equations

Abstract: We prove the L 1 -contraction principle and uniqueness of solutions for quasilinear elliptic parabolic equations of the formwhere b is monotone nondecreasing and continuous. We assume only that u is a weak solution of finite energy. In particular, we do not suppose that the distributional derivative t [b(u)] is a bounded Borel measure or a locally integrable function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
250
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
250
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be obtained either by the technique of Otto [70] (doubling the time variable) or using the theory of integral solutions and nonlinear semigroup methods, consult for example [30]. Besides, u ρ verifies the entropy formulation of Definition 2.2 with fluxes f ρ , A ρ , where η ± c can be replaced by regular "boundary" entropies η ± c,ε , whenever we prefer to do so.…”
Section: Definition 22 (Entropy Solution) An Entropy Solution Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be obtained either by the technique of Otto [70] (doubling the time variable) or using the theory of integral solutions and nonlinear semigroup methods, consult for example [30]. Besides, u ρ verifies the entropy formulation of Definition 2.2 with fluxes f ρ , A ρ , where η ± c can be replaced by regular "boundary" entropies η ± c,ε , whenever we prefer to do so.…”
Section: Definition 22 (Entropy Solution) An Entropy Solution Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product between ∂ t u ρ and A ρ (u ρ ) is handled using the usual chain rule argument (see, e.g., [4,70,30]), where the relevant duality is between the space E :…”
Section: Definition 22 (Entropy Solution) An Entropy Solution Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of regularity of F is the only reason why the doubling of variables in space can be needed for the Stefan-type problems (1) (the doubling of variables in time, see Otto [51], Blanchard and Porretta [24], does not interfere with different boundary conditions; moreover, it can be avoided thanks to the nonlinear semigroup techniques, see Bénilan and Wittbold [21] and Section 5). Let us also mention that for diffusion-convection operators under the general form −div a(t, x; w,∇w), the explicit dependence in x is a major obstacle to apply the doubling of variables technique (except for the case treated by Vallet in [59]); some results for this case were obtained by Blanchard and Porretta in [24] and by Zimmermann [60] under regularity assumptions on F .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them, introduced by Kruzhkov in [28] to prove an L 1 contraction property of entropy solutions of hyperbolic equations, is based in doubling the time variable and performing a passing to the limit in which these variables collapse. This technique has been applied to parabolic scalar equations, see, e.g., [29], [9], [18], [19], [35], and also to certain systems of parabolic equations coupled through reaction terms, but not through transport terms, see [36]. Notice that when applying succesfully this technique, uniqueness is always obtained as a by-product of a comparison principle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%