2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2019.8759099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L1 And L2 Norm Depth-Regularized Estimation Of The Acoustic Attenuation And Backscatter Coefficients Using Dynamic Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, the authors exploited the depth-continuity of the tissue parameters in a regularized cost function. 2 and later, 1 regularization [29] was considered to enforce this continuity of the parameters of interest across the depth axis, where the latter was shown to exhibit superior performance. The resultant cost function was solved iteratively using DP and the method was shown to provide better estimates than those obtained by the least squares method in [26].…”
Section: Benchmark Methods For Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, the authors exploited the depth-continuity of the tissue parameters in a regularized cost function. 2 and later, 1 regularization [29] was considered to enforce this continuity of the parameters of interest across the depth axis, where the latter was shown to exhibit superior performance. The resultant cost function was solved iteratively using DP and the method was shown to provide better estimates than those obtained by the least squares method in [26].…”
Section: Benchmark Methods For Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method was proposed only for attenuation estimation. Estimation of both the backscatter and attenuation coefficients with 2 norm depth-regularization in [28] and later on with 1 norm regularization in [29] was performed using dynamic programming (DP) to solve the considered regularized least squares based cost function. While this DP based approach was demonstrated to perform better than the least squares method in [26], it might not be feasible for real-time applications due to the computational lag experienced while evaluating the cost function at each depth for all the possible values of the parameters within the user-specified search range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [23] further proposed a spatially weighted TV regularization scheme to deal with tissue heterogeneity. Another method based on dynamic programming (DP) exploited piece-wise continuity of the target coefficients using an 2 [24] and 1 regularization [25] strategy. It was shown to provide more accurate estimates than [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 1 norm regularization schemes solved using dynamic programming-based approach [9,10]. An 2 regularized scheme, named ALGEBRA, was also recently proposed wherein the backscatter signal model was fit to the data in a linear least-squares (LLS) manner [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%