1994
DOI: 10.4310/jdg/1214455073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$L^p$ cohomology of cones and horns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [1] Brasselet, Goresky, and MacPherson conjectured that, for all p ∈ (1, ∞), the L p -cohomology is isomorphic to the corresponding intersection homology for varieties with conical singularities. Youssin [16] proved this conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In [1] Brasselet, Goresky, and MacPherson conjectured that, for all p ∈ (1, ∞), the L p -cohomology is isomorphic to the corresponding intersection homology for varieties with conical singularities. Youssin [16] proved this conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, Cheeger, Goresky and MacPherson in [4] stated that the L 2 -cohomology groups of the regular sets of Riemannian pseudomanifolds are isomorphic to the intersection cohomology groups with the lower middle perversities. These studies have still been developing by many mathematicians (see [5][6][7][8]). Recently, Albin, Leichtnam, Mazzeo and Piazza in [9] studied the Hodge theory on more general singular spaces, which were called Cheeger spaces.…”
Section: Theorem 1 (Bochner Vanishing Theorem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here H β 1 and H β 2 are standard β 1 -and β 2 -horns; see the notation from [1,14]. If ν(3) = 1, then MH ν loc,1 (M β 1 ,β 2 , 0) = 0 .…”
Section: Some Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%