L’Isola che (non) c’è

Florio, Giulia De

doi:10.36253/979-12-215-0034-9

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 66 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fall: псомъ (24), пси (26), что (50) and others. Confusion: вьзьми (48), вьзъми (53), вьзьми (56), вьзѧтъ (57); cf.…”

Section: § 155 Rendition Of the Yersunclassified

“…Confusion: имѫщъ (5), скрьгьщѧ (9) (for canonical скрьжьтати ‹837›), възможъна (32), слъзами (34), вьздвиже (45), въшъдъшю (46), вь (46), ничимъже (50), постомъ (51), съде (61), вьзьрѣвъ (69), плънѣ (75), etc.…”

Section: § 224 Rendition Of the Yersunclassified

“…Mt 26, 31-75 [31] тъгда глагола имъ исусъ• вьси вы съблазните сѧ о мьнѣ въ сиѭ нощь• пьсано бо ѥстъ поражѫ пастыр҄ꙗ и разидѫтъ сѧ овьцѧ стада• [32] по въскрьсновении же моѥмь варꙗѭ вы въ галилеи• [33] отъвѣщавъ же петръ рече ѥму• аще и вьси съблазнѧтъ сѧ о тебѣ• азъ николиже не съблазн҄ѭ (a) сѧ• [34] рече ѥму исусъ• аминь глагол҄ѭ тебѣ• ꙗко въ сиѭ нощь прѣЖе даже кокотъ не възгласитъ• три краты отъврьжеши сѧ мене• [35] глагола ѥму петръ• аще ми сѧ кл҄ючитъ съ тобоѭ умрѣти• не отъврьгѫ сѧ тебе• такоЖе и вьси ученици рѣшѧ• [36] тъгда приде исусъ въ вьсь наричемѫѭ (b) ћетьсимани• и глагола ученикомъ сѣдите ту• доидеже шьдъ помол҄ѭ сѧ тамо• [37] и поимъ петра• и оба сына зеведеова• начѧтъ скръбѣти и тѫжити• [38] тъгда глагола имъ исусъ• прискръбьна ѥстъ душа моꙗ до съмрьти• пожидѣте сьде и бъдите съ мъноѭ• [39] и прѣшьдъ мало паде ниць молѧ сѧ и глагол҄ѩ• отьче мои аще възможьно ѥстъ да мимоидетъ отъ мене чаша си• обаче не ꙗко азъ хощѫ• нъ ꙗкоже ты• [40] и въставъ отъ молитвы приде къ ученикомъ и обрѣте ѩ съпѧщѧ• и глагола петрови• тако ли не възможе ѥдиного часа побъдѣти съ мъноѭ• [41] бъдите и молите сѧ да не вънидете въ напасть• духъ бо бъдръ а плъть немощьна• [42] пакы въторицеѭ шьдъ помоли сѧ глагол҄ѩ• отьче мои аще не възможетъ чаша си мимоити отъ мене• аще не пиѭ ѥѩ• бѫди вол҄ꙗ твоꙗ• [43] и пришьдъ пакы обрѣте ѩ съпѧщѧ• бѣсте бо очи имъ тѧжьцѣ• [44] и оставл҄ь ѩ пакы шьдъ помоли сѧ третиицеѭ• (c) тъЖе слово рекъ• [45] тъгда приде къ ученикомъ• и глагола имъ съпите прочеѥ и почиваѥте• се приближи сѧ година• и сынъ чловѣчьскыи прѣдаѥтъ сѧ въ рѫкы грѣшьникомъ• [46] въстанѣте идѣмъ• се приближи сѧ прѣдаѩи мѧ• [47] и ѥще глагол҄ѭщу ѥму• се июда ѥдинъ отъ обою на десѧте приде• и съ нимь народъ мъногъ• съ орѫжии и дрькольми• отъ архиереи и старьць людьскыихъ• [48] прѣдаѩи же и дастъ имъ знамениѥ глагол҄ѩ• ѥгоже аще лобъжѫ тъ ѥстъ имѣте и• [49] и абиѥ пристѫпл҄ь къ исусови рече ѥму• радуи сѧ равьви• и облобыза и• [50] исусъ же рече ѥму• друже на нѥже ѥси пришьлъ твори• тъгда пристѫпл҄ьше възложишѧ рѫцѣ на исуса и ѩсѧ и• [51] (a) Wordforms of the lexeme съвѣдѣтел҄ьство without kamora in MSU70. (b) Wordforms of the lexeme съвѣдѣтел҄ьствовати without kamora in MSU70 (c) MSU70 живымь: aberrant spellout for Plen (see § 394); li...…”

Section: Chrestomathy Normalized Textsunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Old Church Slavic

Polivanova

2023

Biblioteca Di Studi Slavistici

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This book contains a synchronic grammar and grammatical dictionaries of Old Church Slavic. The framework is based on a substantially revised version of the classical descriptive methodology. The intent is to improve on the classical monographs by Vaillant, Diels, Lunt in the direction of utmost completeness, explicitness, and deliberate consistency between the grammatical structure, the corpus of texts (limited to the seven oldest OCS manuscripts), and the dictionaries. The grammar is intended as a set of rules that provide a complete characterization of any OCS wordform. Peculiarities in the language of each source are described as systematic departures from canonical OCS, a conventional constructed variety primarily described by the grammar. The book is addressed to linguists working in Slavic studies, as well as to specialists in the general theory of grammar, especially phonologists and morphologists. Data from the dictionaries are freely available as a searchable database online here.

show abstract

“…Fall: псомъ (24), пси (26), что (50) and others. Confusion: вьзьми (48), вьзъми (53), вьзьми (56), вьзѧтъ (57); cf.…”

Section: § 155 Rendition Of the Yersunclassified

Section: § 224 Rendition Of the Yersunclassified

Section: Chrestomathy Normalized Textsunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Old Church Slavic

Polivanova

2023

Biblioteca Di Studi Slavistici

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…I due sintagmi sono equivalenti. Strutture riflessive, come quelle in (50) In (76) la forma thyer, preceduta dall'articolo, corrisponde ad un aggettivo e la struttura denota semplicemente la condizione della porta, quindi l'interpretazione eventiva è esclusa e solo quella stativa è ammessa.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

L’aspettualità nel contatto linguistico: lingue slave e oltre

2023

Biblioteca Di Studi Slavistici

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This volume investigates the functional-semantic field of aspectuality in relation to the role of language contact in the development of minority languages in Italy and beyond, highlighting hitherto completely unknown parallels, e.g. contact-induced development of progressive and prospective verbal periphrases. The influences of the dominant languages surface not only in Slavic derivational verbal aspect, but also in the restructuring of morphosyntactic reflexes of aspect. Aspectuality is examined in relation to Slavic micro-languages spoken in Italy (Molise Slavic, Resian, Tersko, Nadiško), Austria (Burgenland Croatian), Germany (Upper Sorbian), Albania (Kaj-nas) and the Baltic, as well as in relation to Arbëresh, Cimbrian, Griko, Lithuanian and Macedonian.

show abstract

Translating Russian Literature into Italian: A Case Study between Language and Culture

Remonato

2023

TSTP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present article focuses on some reflectionsabout the process of translation into Italian of the well-known Russian fairy tale by Aleksey Nikolaevich Tolstoy(1882-1945) Zolotoy klyuchik, ili Priklyucheniya Buratino(The Little Golden Key, or the Adventures of Burattino, 1935). Basing from the methodological point of view on some recent acquisitions of international TranslationTheory, we will examine the main “difficulties” or “challenges” for the translator present in the source text, such as anisomorphisms, linguistic connotations, neologisms, cultural realia and phraseologisms. We willalso consider the employment of different stylistic registersin the tale, often connected to the characters’ “expressiveaura” and to thick intertextual allusions to Russian Silver Age. Our lexical and stylistic choices in the translated text will be analyzed with regard to the dominants of the original work and to the specific characteristics of Russian(and Soviet) children literature of the time. Some solutionsproposed in the two published Italian versions of the 1980swill be also taken into account, questioning the opportunityand the main orientations of a new translation in relation to the kind of “implied readers” expected.

show abstract

L’Isola che (non) c’è

Cited by 3 publications

References 66 publications

Old Church Slavic

Old Church Slavic

L’aspettualità nel contatto linguistico: lingue slave e oltre

Translating Russian Literature into Italian: A Case Study between Language and Culture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About