2004
DOI: 10.3917/autr.031.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L'illusion participative

Abstract: Quand tu dis la vérité, n'oublie pas le mensonge. Proverbe sakalava Depuis un petit nombre d'années, la manière dont les pays occidentaux envisagent leur aide au développement est en cours de profonde transformation. Avant les années quatre-vingt ou, parfois, quatre-vingt-dix, le développement a surtout été conçu sur la base d'innovations techniques qu'il convenait de diffuser dans les sociétés cibles. Le progrès technique était en quelque sorte octroyé à des populations qui, le plus souvent, ne l'avaient pas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to some authors, greater local participation in decision making or, at the very least, a better understanding of local needs and desires and the incorporation of these are key aspects in the design and implementation of conservation and development programs, and underpin decentralization theory (Ribot 1996;Agrawal and Ribot 1999). Pamard and Fauroux (2004) noted, for example, that "the failure of development interventions in western Madagascar is mainly linked to a top-down approach that does not allow people to truly take ownership of innovation". It can also lead to the disempowerment of local actors by conservation professionals (Rodaly 1998).…”
Section: Local Communities Marginalized During the Design And Implemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some authors, greater local participation in decision making or, at the very least, a better understanding of local needs and desires and the incorporation of these are key aspects in the design and implementation of conservation and development programs, and underpin decentralization theory (Ribot 1996;Agrawal and Ribot 1999). Pamard and Fauroux (2004) noted, for example, that "the failure of development interventions in western Madagascar is mainly linked to a top-down approach that does not allow people to truly take ownership of innovation". It can also lead to the disempowerment of local actors by conservation professionals (Rodaly 1998).…”
Section: Local Communities Marginalized During the Design And Implemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les activités économiques déployées ne constituent pas de réelles compensations pour les ménages qui subissent le coût de la conservation, d'une part parce que les moyens déployés sont inadéquats, d'autre part parce que l'argent va ailleurs. Les TGRN font face à une limite connue des projets de développement communautaire : la concentration des bénéfices aux mains des élites coutumières et/ou économiques (Ribot, 2002 ;Blanc-Pamard et Fauroux, 2004). Globalement le financement de ces activités économiques ne contribuera pas à modifier les comportements et donc à limiter la déforestation.…”
Section: Des Transferts De Gestion Peu Incitatifsunclassified
“…We use age and geographic origin indicators to measure the social endowments that determine land access. We expect land restrictions to affect young households and migrants first and foremost since the Malagasy rural society is organized through lineages under the authority of the oldest individuals [41], which means that young households have to rely on the oldest members of the community for access to land. Here, as elsewhere in Madagascar [42], land access for migrants is controlled by the natives (tompontany, or landlord).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%