L'homme comme sujet

Abstract

Résumé Le contexte économique actuel tend à favoriser les réflexions à propos de la place de l’homme dans les pratiques et recherches en gestion. L’humain dans l’entreprise peut être considéré comme un moyen au service de la rentabilité. Il peut également être reconnu comme une fin en soi, un sujet doté d’affectivité. Cet article propose de présenter dans un premier temps la vision traditionnelle de l’entreprise et la gestion des hommes qui en découle. Pourtant, certains courants déjà anciens comme le personnalisme, ou certaines visions du monde comme l’humanisme, ouvrent des perspectives très différentes, dans lesquelles la personnalisation et la subjectivité prennent une place importante. Plus récemment, les courants de la Responsabilité Sociale et du Développement Durable, ainsi que les Critical Management Studies, offrent un support à cette personnalisation. Il apparaît que ces approches portent une autre vision du monde, qui modifie les perspectives épistémologiques.

Research on the Multi-Period Optimal Fee of the Money Manager Under Cumulative Prospect Theory

“…University governance crises, especially those related to research, result from different factors. In this paper, we wish to have more of an epistemological view leading to the localization of their origin in a kind of problem representation (by the designers of this governance) of the research that relates to its "dehumanization" (Baumard, 2012).This dehumanization refers in a certain way to the depersonalization of research (Paradas, 2012). It leads to the implicit rejection of the researcher's status as an anthropological being with his own desires whose satisfaction can be targeted in his profession (Alvarez & Oriot, 2007).…”

“…For recent years, we have been facing the resurgence of different studies based on the individualist paradigm, the personalist theory and the humanist ideology for most of them. These studies militate in favor of more consideration for personal values in the field of Research in Management Sciences, considering that the researcher is a person of interest who prefers what is useful to him (Paradas 2012, Alvarez & Orot 2007.…”

“…It apprehends the researcher-Manager in the light of Personalist or Kantian philosophy, psychology and humanist ideology which invite to consider him as animated by personal values or desires. Some authors show that these desires are defensible in the execution of research activities (Paradas, 2012). The epistemological problem raised by such a view is that of the selfish or self-referential character of any research (whether Manager or not) which, as we will see later in this work, is far from being marginal for University governance (Louvel & Valette, 2014;Courpasson & Guedri, 2007).…”

Faculty of Law and Administration,

“…On the other hand -the "person" is a "whole", an object of dignity and should always be a goal of actionnever should be a means to achieve particular goals [12]. A notion of dignity, fundamental both for the personalism as a philosophy and for contemporary theories of human rights, focuses on each person's incomparability and uniqueness [13].…”