2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2019.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L-estimates for time fractional parabolic equations with coefficients measurable in time

Abstract: We establish the Lp-solvability for time fractional parabolic equations when coefficients are merely measurable in the time variable. In the spatial variables, the leading coefficients locally have small mean oscillations. Our results extend a recent result in [6] to a large extent.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 35R11, 26A33, 35R05.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
89
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides that they are singular integral free, another advantage of these approaches is their flexibility: they can be applied to both divergence and non-divergence or even nonlocal equations with coefficients which are very irregular in some of the independent variables. See, for instance, [2,13,14,10,9,11,6] and the references therein. The class of coefficients considered in this paper was first treated by the second named author and Krylov in [13,14] for elliptic and parabolic equations in non-divergence form, and later also in [7] (without symmetric condition on a ij ), [3] (with symmetric a ij ), and [10,9,8,4] for elliptic and parabolic equations and systems in divergence form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides that they are singular integral free, another advantage of these approaches is their flexibility: they can be applied to both divergence and non-divergence or even nonlocal equations with coefficients which are very irregular in some of the independent variables. See, for instance, [2,13,14,10,9,11,6] and the references therein. The class of coefficients considered in this paper was first treated by the second named author and Krylov in [13,14] for elliptic and parabolic equations in non-divergence form, and later also in [7] (without symmetric condition on a ij ), [3] (with symmetric a ij ), and [10,9,8,4] for elliptic and parabolic equations and systems in divergence form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we adapted the level set argument in [5] to equations of the form (1.1) with a nonlocal time derivative term, following the scheme in [6]. The main difficulty arises in the key step where one needs to estimate local L ∞ estimates of the gradient of solutions to locally homogeneous equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To prove that J is a contraction, one has to argue as above, exploiting also the fact that for bounded z ∈ β V 2 p , p > d + 2 β , then Dz is bounded in L ∞ (Q τ ). Using [18,Lemma A.6] and using that (z 1 − z 2 )(0) = 0 we have…”
Section: Existence and Uniqueness For The Time-fractional Hamilton-jamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the purely Dirichlet or purely conormal problems, the approximation function in our problem is less regular, which is only W 1,4−ε , not Lipschitz. This situation is similar to [11], where dedicated decay rates of the level sets are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%