2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0248-8663(00)90084-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L'éosinopénie : un critère discriminant en faveur des infections microbiennes au cours des syndromes inflammatoires inexpliqués, à propos de 106 cas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eosinopenia has been identi ed as a sign of acute infection for a long time [6][7][8] and its correlation with sepsis was rstly reported by Abidi et.al in 2008 [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eosinopenia has been identi ed as a sign of acute infection for a long time [6][7][8] and its correlation with sepsis was rstly reported by Abidi et.al in 2008 [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, seeking timely, sensitive and speci c biomarkers has become the research focus in this eld, with C reaction protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and white blood cell count as potential candidates, while the e ciency is far below satisfaction [3,4] Eosinophils, comprising 1%-3% of circulating leukocytes, play a role in host defense against helminths and the propagation of allergic conditions, and are considered as an integral part of immune and in ammatory network, and homeostatic regulation as well in recent years [5]. The reduction of circulating eosinophil count (namely eosinopenia) in response to acute infection was rstly described in 1893 by Zappert et al [6], and is now acknowledged as a signal of acute infection [7,8]. The feasibility of eosinopenia in diagnosis of sepsis was rstly tested by Abidi et al, who showed that eosinopenia is good at discriminating between non-infection and infection, but is rather weak in differentiating sepsis from systemic in ammatory response syndrome (SIRS) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first described by Zappert in 1893 (19) and in the early 1900s, was considered a useful diagnostic tool (20). Gil and colleagues observed that sepsis associated with an eosinophil count <40 cells/mm 3 is related to bacterial infections (21). In acute bacterial infection of infants, absolute eosinophil count of zero was reported (22,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, literature between eosinophils and infectious diseases -helminthes apart -appears to be scarce. One study found that eosinophil count under 40/mm3 with elevated white cell count (over 10,000/mm3) was associated with bacterial infectious diseases (14,15). Another study found that eosinophils < 10/mm 3 alone or in association with elevated white blood cell count or high CRP blood level was strongly associated with sepsis (speci city 94-98 %) in an emergency department (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%