1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01879581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L-bursts in Jupiter's decametric radio spectra

Abstract: Dynamic spectra of Jupiter's L-bursts are observed with high-resolution radio spectrographs. The L-bursts are characterized by their emission envelopes. The duration of envelopes varies from one to a few seconds increasing towards the opposition of Jupiter to reach a maximum in the vicinity of 10 to 20 d after opposition. Modulation lanes appear within the emission envelopes. The magnitude of the f-t slopes of lanes is determined by the central meridian longitude (CML) of Jupiter, and partly by the longitude o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows several examples of dynamic spectra of Jovian decametric L emission actually possessing frequency drifting millisecond structures resembling S bursts. This type of spectral structure is different from the phenomenon of modulation lanes reported in earlier papers (Ellis 1975;Riihimaa 1970Riihimaa , 1978Imai et al 1997), since it has a much faster (and typically negative) frequency drift rate in the range of −5 MHz/s to −6 MHz/s, and shorter timescale of amplitude variation at fixed frequency (10−20 ms). These numbers should be compared to ±20 kHz/s to ±300 kHz/s drift rates in Riihimaa (1978) and 2−10 s timescales in .…”
Section: Slow S Bursts Accompanying L Emissioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 2 shows several examples of dynamic spectra of Jovian decametric L emission actually possessing frequency drifting millisecond structures resembling S bursts. This type of spectral structure is different from the phenomenon of modulation lanes reported in earlier papers (Ellis 1975;Riihimaa 1970Riihimaa , 1978Imai et al 1997), since it has a much faster (and typically negative) frequency drift rate in the range of −5 MHz/s to −6 MHz/s, and shorter timescale of amplitude variation at fixed frequency (10−20 ms). These numbers should be compared to ±20 kHz/s to ±300 kHz/s drift rates in Riihimaa (1978) and 2−10 s timescales in .…”
Section: Slow S Bursts Accompanying L Emissioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…This type of spectral structure is different from the phenomenon of modulation lanes reported in earlier papers (Ellis 1975;Riihimaa 1970Riihimaa , 1978Imai et al 1997), since it has a much faster (and typically negative) frequency drift rate in the range of −5 MHz/s to −6 MHz/s, and shorter timescale of amplitude variation at fixed frequency (10−20 ms). These numbers should be compared to ±20 kHz/s to ±300 kHz/s drift rates in Riihimaa (1978) and 2−10 s timescales in . Somewhat similar although slower drifting modulation lanes (−2 MHz/s) were called "fast lane" (FL) bursts in (Ellis 1975).…”
Section: Slow S Bursts Accompanying L Emissioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the time scales, the Jovian DAM exhibits different complex spectral structures. The S-bursts of DAM are detected as very short (milliseconds) impulsive spikes with fast drift in the time-frequency plane (Riihimaa, 1970(Riihimaa, , 1977Leblanc et al, 1980). The occurrence of the S-bursts observation depends on the orbital position of the satellite Io.…”
Section: Jupiter Radio Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have investigated the modulation events, and some of their results can be found in Gordon & Warwick (1967); Riihimaa (1968Riihimaa ( , 1970Riihimaa ( , 1978Riihimaa ( , 1979Riihimaa ( , 1988Riihimaa ( , 1991; Riihimaa et al (1970); ; Zheleznyakov & Shaposhnikov (1979); Meyer-Vernet et al (1981); Warwick & Dulk (1964); Lecacheux (1976); Ladreiter et al (1995); Imai et al (1997); Arkhypov & Rucker (2007). For instance, Faraday rotation of the polarization plane in the Jupiter decameter signal was Article published by EDP Sciences considered in detail by Warwick & Dulk (1964); Lecacheux (1976); Ladreiter et al (1995); Shaposhnikov et al (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%