2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L’autogreffe conjonctivo-limbique dans la chirurgie du ptérygion : suture versus colle biologique à propos de 30 cas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average age was 52.04+/-11.76 years old (25 to 80). This average age like the one in the literature, with 45 years old for Kammoun in Tunisia, and 40 years old for Moukouri [3,13,14] in Cameroon. Zarrouki in a comparative study, had mean ages of 51.5 and 54 years old.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average age was 52.04+/-11.76 years old (25 to 80). This average age like the one in the literature, with 45 years old for Kammoun in Tunisia, and 40 years old for Moukouri [3,13,14] in Cameroon. Zarrouki in a comparative study, had mean ages of 51.5 and 54 years old.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Stage III pterygium was the most frequent with 60% of cases. Kammoun found almost the same distribution of pterygium per stage with 68% of stage III pterygium, whereas Zarrouki in Morocco had 50% of stage III pterygium [3,14]. We had to choose between several cases, and we selected patients with the most advanced stages of pterygium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recurrence of pterygium usually occurs within one year after surgery, which is a major challenge for ophthalmologists. Limbal-conjunctival autograft transplantation is currently considered one of the most effective surgical procedures for treating pterygium [18,19]. Based on the results of the present study, limbal-conjunctival autograft transplantation is superior to conjunctival autograft transplantation in terms of recurrence rate and corneal epithelial healing time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%