1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf02223076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L'arme frontale des soldats de termites. I. Rhinotermitidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Myles (1988) suggests that it is in Zootermopsis that the soldier weapons are best suited for siblicidal fighting; in other termites, the evolution of these weapons towards an improvement of colony defence would have reduced their efficacy in siblicidal fights and led to the abandonment of their expression in neotenics. A decrease of intraspecific efficacy may be true for soldiers with reduced mandibles such as nasutes, some rhinotermitids (e.g., Acorhinotermes, Quennedey and Deligne, 1975), extremely phragmotic (plug-shaped) kalotermitids (Scheffrahn et al, 1998), but not for the many genera that have retained sharp and powerful mandibles. In addition, why could the original siblicidal neotenic morph not have retained its fighting abilities while a colony-defending morph was diverging from it, just as two distinct soldier morphs diverged in a number of termite species ?…”
Section: Evolution Of the Soldier Castementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Myles (1988) suggests that it is in Zootermopsis that the soldier weapons are best suited for siblicidal fighting; in other termites, the evolution of these weapons towards an improvement of colony defence would have reduced their efficacy in siblicidal fights and led to the abandonment of their expression in neotenics. A decrease of intraspecific efficacy may be true for soldiers with reduced mandibles such as nasutes, some rhinotermitids (e.g., Acorhinotermes, Quennedey and Deligne, 1975), extremely phragmotic (plug-shaped) kalotermitids (Scheffrahn et al, 1998), but not for the many genera that have retained sharp and powerful mandibles. In addition, why could the original siblicidal neotenic morph not have retained its fighting abilities while a colony-defending morph was diverging from it, just as two distinct soldier morphs diverged in a number of termite species ?…”
Section: Evolution Of the Soldier Castementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, why could the original siblicidal neotenic morph not have retained its fighting abilities while a colony-defending morph was diverging from it, just as two distinct soldier morphs diverged in a number of termite species ? For instance in Rhinotermes and Dolichorhinotermes, the major soldier possesses powerful mandibles whereas the minor soldier relies on chemical defence (Quennedey and Deligne, 1975). In all species of thrips with soldiers, foundresses have retained their fighting ability (Crespi et al, 1997) with weapons less developed than those of soldiers.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Soldier Castementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus has had a checkered past in that some authors have felt the distinctions between Dolichorhinotermes, RhinotermesHagen, and Acorhinotermes Emerson were subtle and intergraded (e.g., Mathews, 1977). However, Quennedey and Deligne (1975) identified significant morphological characters of the soldier head capsule, particularly features of the labrum, that justify the recognition of separate, albeit closely related, genera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Two well-supported clades within the Rhinotermitidae are 1) the subfamily Rhinotermitinae (with, e.g., Parrhinotermes and Schedorhinotermes), and 2) the one including Coptotermes, Reticulitermes, and Heterotermes (Emerson, 1971;Quennedey and Deligne, 1975;Kitade and Lo, 1998). The branching pattern of the other genera remains highly hypothetical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%