2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2019)117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L∞ algebras and tensor hierarchies in Exceptional Field Theory and Gauged Supergravity

Abstract: We show how the gauge and field structure of the tensor hierarchies in Double and E 7(7)Exceptional Field Theory fits into L ∞ algebras. Special attention is paid to redefinitions, the role of covariantly constrained fields and intertwiners. The results are connected to Gauged Supergravities through generalized Scherk-Schwarz reductions. We find that certain gaugingdependent parameters generate trivial gauge transformations, giving rise to novel symmetries for symmetries that are absent in their ungauged count… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same expressions are also interpreted as the conditions for gauge invariance and closure of gauge transformations for a topological threebrane sigmamodel, where the fluxes appear as generalized Wess-Zumino terms. It would be interesting to understand better the geometric features of the algebroid structure defined by our SL(5) projection of the Lie algebroid up to homotopy on T M ⊕ 2 T * M. Given that the higher Courant algebroid structure on this extended bundle has a well-known realization as an L ∞ -algebra, see for example [18,19,59], it is an interesting problem to see how our specific Lie algebroid up to homotopy fits into recent discussions of the L ∞ -algebra structure of gauge symmetries underlying the tensor hierarchy in exceptional field theory, see for instance [60][61][62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same expressions are also interpreted as the conditions for gauge invariance and closure of gauge transformations for a topological threebrane sigmamodel, where the fluxes appear as generalized Wess-Zumino terms. It would be interesting to understand better the geometric features of the algebroid structure defined by our SL(5) projection of the Lie algebroid up to homotopy on T M ⊕ 2 T * M. Given that the higher Courant algebroid structure on this extended bundle has a well-known realization as an L ∞ -algebra, see for example [18,19,59], it is an interesting problem to see how our specific Lie algebroid up to homotopy fits into recent discussions of the L ∞ -algebra structure of gauge symmetries underlying the tensor hierarchy in exceptional field theory, see for instance [60][61][62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that in supergravity models, the Bianchi identities induce a L ∞ -algebra structure on the (shifted) tensor hierarchy [17], it would seem natural to understand how one passes from the tensor hierarchy algebra structure on T = h ⊕ T ′ to a L ∞ -algebra on T ′ [−1]. This is all the more important since L ∞ algebras have recently drawn much interests in supergravity theories [3,5,[13][14][15]. This topic is indeed important because these L ∞ structures encode the field strengths of the theory and their corresponding Bianchi identities.…”
Section: This Is An Equivalence Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, a renewal of interest in L ∞ -algebras has soared in the supergravity community, in relation with the formalism of tensor hierarchies [3,5,[13][14][15]17]. These L ∞algebras would in some sense encode the field strength of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent resurgence of physics interest in L ∞ -algebras (e.g. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]) mostly centres on gauge symmetries of classical theories. (Most relevant here is [28], which articulates the lore that classical BV master actions have canonical associated L ∞ -algebras [16,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]).…”
Section: Jhep07(2019)115mentioning
confidence: 99%