2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L’accouchement à bas risque : existe-t-il ?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to what is reported by the majority of authors with an average age that is always higher in the "high-risk" group of patients [6] [7] [8].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are similar to what is reported by the majority of authors with an average age that is always higher in the "high-risk" group of patients [6] [7] [8].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…With respect to medical interventions, a caesarean section was performed in 8.7% of "low risk" pregnancies, three times less than that of "high risk" pregnancies. However, this rate is still higher than the national rate of caesarean sections, which is around 5% [6] [9].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also we did not have access to medical records relating to maternity and information on “pregnancy at risk” was based on self-reporting by workers. There was no consensual definition and literature data on this variable are scarce [34, 35]. In a report from the French National Authority for Health, the rate of “pregnancy at risk” was 20% versus 24.8% for our study [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Ils ont été définis grâce à la comparaison de différentes études menées en France et à l'étranger (voir Annexe II). Nous avons utilisé les critères de l'étude similaire réalisée à Auxerre (maternité de type II)[14] et nous en avons ajouté certains : l'absence d'une consommation excessive de tabac, d'alcool ou la toxicomanie et l'absence d'antécédents médicaux ou obstétricaux particuliers. Ces critères, à part le tabac, sont retrouvés dans les recommandations du NICE et dans la liste d'indications obstétricales des Pays--Bas [12, 16].…”
unclassified