“…Although Kyrgyzstan did not experience the type of overt, generalized, ethno-regional violence that shocked some other parts of the collapsing Soviet empire, ethnic and regional tensions, largely suppressed under most of the Soviet rule, became evident and omnipresent as that rule began to weaken in the late 1980s. While the government of the newly independent country declared a grand goal of building a new unified Kyrgyzstani nation, in practice the ‘nationalizing state’ (Brubaker, 1996) has produced a rising tide of nationalist rhetoric, including vigorous promotion of the language and cultural symbols of the titular group, the Kyrgyz (Huskey, 1997; Laruelle, 2012; Marat, 2008; Wachtel, 2013), paralleling the trends in several other parts of the former empire (e.g. Brubaker, 2011; Isaacs and Polese, 2016; Kolstø and Blakkisrud, 2013; Landau and Kellner-Heinkele, 2001).…”