1997
DOI: 10.1163/187633297x00103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kyrgyzstan: a Case Study for Conflict Potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Kyrgyzstan did not experience the type of overt, generalized, ethno-regional violence that shocked some other parts of the collapsing Soviet empire, ethnic and regional tensions, largely suppressed under most of the Soviet rule, became evident and omnipresent as that rule began to weaken in the late 1980s. While the government of the newly independent country declared a grand goal of building a new unified Kyrgyzstani nation, in practice the ‘nationalizing state’ (Brubaker, 1996) has produced a rising tide of nationalist rhetoric, including vigorous promotion of the language and cultural symbols of the titular group, the Kyrgyz (Huskey, 1997; Laruelle, 2012; Marat, 2008; Wachtel, 2013), paralleling the trends in several other parts of the former empire (e.g. Brubaker, 2011; Isaacs and Polese, 2016; Kolstø and Blakkisrud, 2013; Landau and Kellner-Heinkele, 2001).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Kyrgyzstan did not experience the type of overt, generalized, ethno-regional violence that shocked some other parts of the collapsing Soviet empire, ethnic and regional tensions, largely suppressed under most of the Soviet rule, became evident and omnipresent as that rule began to weaken in the late 1980s. While the government of the newly independent country declared a grand goal of building a new unified Kyrgyzstani nation, in practice the ‘nationalizing state’ (Brubaker, 1996) has produced a rising tide of nationalist rhetoric, including vigorous promotion of the language and cultural symbols of the titular group, the Kyrgyz (Huskey, 1997; Laruelle, 2012; Marat, 2008; Wachtel, 2013), paralleling the trends in several other parts of the former empire (e.g. Brubaker, 2011; Isaacs and Polese, 2016; Kolstø and Blakkisrud, 2013; Landau and Kellner-Heinkele, 2001).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although the new ethno-political reality is being increasingly defined by the majority vs. minority divide, the titular majority, constituting some 70% of the country’s population, is not culturally and politically uniform. While the diversity within Kyrgyz is multidimensional (Huskey, 1997), I focus on what is probably the most prominent regional distinction – between Kyrgyz living in the northern and southern parts of the country. The north–south divide has deep historical roots and its political, social, and economic implications have been widely acknowledged in the literature (e.g.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its independence in 1991, Kyrgyzstan has endured spells of political instability and deep economic crisis, which have impoverished large segments of the population (Huskey 1997;Falkingham 2005). Currently about 40% of Kyrgyzstanis are classified as poor, i.e., having consumption expenditures below the official poverty line (NSC of the Kyrgyz Republic 2007; Ruget and Usmanalieva 2008).…”
Section: The Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its independence, Kyrgyzstan has lived through spells of political instability and deep economic crisis, which has impoverished large segments of the population (Huskey 1997, Falkingham 2005). Currently about 40 percent of Kyrgyzstanis can be classified as poor (Ruget and Usmanalieva 2008).…”
Section: The Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%