2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10203-019-00231-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kyle equilibrium under random price pressure

Abstract: We study the equilibrium in the model proposed by Kyle in 1985 and extended to the continuous time setting by Back in 1992. The novelty of this paper is that we consider a framework where the price pressure can be random. We also allow for a random release time of the fundamental value of the asset. This framework includes all the particular Kyle models proposed in the literature. The results enlighten the equilibrium properties shared by all these models and guide the way of finding equilibria in this context. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above setup uses the standard definition of equilibrium as in Back [1]. The difference lies in the generalisation of the set of admissible pricing rules that in particular includes the ones used in the current literature (see, e.g., [2], [11], [12], [6], [9], [14], [13], and [19]). Moreover, the signal of the insider is not assumed to be Markovian, i.e.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above setup uses the standard definition of equilibrium as in Back [1]. The difference lies in the generalisation of the set of admissible pricing rules that in particular includes the ones used in the current literature (see, e.g., [2], [11], [12], [6], [9], [14], [13], and [19]). Moreover, the signal of the insider is not assumed to be Markovian, i.e.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will show that the pricing rule employed therein allows infinite profit for the insider that uses trading strategies with martingale component and describe the correct penalization of the martingale component that prevents such opportunities and ensures that the absolutely continuous strategies are optimal. 13 Although this model does not directly fit to the above framework at a first sight, the exponential character of τ allows us to view the setting of Back and Baruch (and a more general version studied in C ¸etin [9]) as an infinite horizon version of the Kyle model.…”
Section: Penalization In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above setup uses the standard definition of equilibirum as in Back [1]. The difference lies in the generalisation of the set of admissible pricing rules that in particular includes the ones used in the current literature (see, e.g., [2], [10], [11], [5], [8], [13], [12], and [18]). Moreover, the signal of the insider is not assumed to be Markovian contrary to the common assumption.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Back's result was the original justification for restricting the set of admissible controls of the insider to absolutely continuous ones and this restriction is now standard in the asymmetric information literature (see, e.g., [2], [10], [11], [5], [8], [13], [12], and [18]). In this paper we show that if we extend the class of pricing rules beyond harmonic functions of total order to include ones used in the recent literature, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%