Kvalita života v mestách: východiská, prístupy, poznatky

Andráško, Ivan

doi:10.5817/cz.muni.m210-8271-2016

Cited by 9 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is a subjective dimension (individual, personal and private) and objective dimension (public, social and environmental). The quality of life can be understood as a result of the interaction between these two dimensions or the interaction between outer impacts and the inner "environment" of an individual (for example, in the works of Dissart and Deller 2000, Massam 2002, Pacione 2003, Andráško 2005and 2016, Ira 2005, Ira and Andráško 2007, Ira and Murgaš 2008, Murgaš 2008, Godor and Horňák 2010, Kačmárová et al 2013and Rišová 2016. Basically, it can be said, that the objective dimension of the quality of life represents (external) conditions and impacts of the surrounding environment and life circumstances on the life of an individual.…”

Section: Gross National Happiness Index In the Context Of The Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At present, the most often used approach in the quality of life measurement is making composite indexes. Andráško (2016) says that the method of their construction consists in that the selected partial dimensions of the quality of life are evaluated or quantified at first, and then the obtained figures are "added up" in a certain way with the aim to obtain data, which should express the level of the quality of life of an individual or a group of people in a complex way.…”

Section: Gross National Happiness Index In the Context Of The Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indicators/indexes are used for the expression of quantity in the selected spheres of the quality of life within ordinary applied methods (Andráško 2016). Murgaš (2008) indicates them as indicators, components, criteria, agents, domains and subdomains.…”

Section: Gross National Happiness Index In the Context Of The Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The survey of indicators and domains selection in the foreign bibliography is given in the works of Džuka (2004), Ira and Andráško (2007), Ira and Murgaš (2008), Murgaš (2009), Andráško (2016) and Rišová (2016). Dissart and Deller (2000) think that the list of the quality of life components is in fact unlimited.…”

Section: Gross National Happiness Index In the Context Of The Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…by Michálek (2008). Blomquist et al (1998in Andráško 2016 assessed selected urban areas in the USA considering the level of wages, tenancy and local living conditions. Within the prosperity domain, Murgaš (2009), in addition to the income indicator, also designated motor vehicle possession as the second highest investment following property acquisition.…”

Section: Achieved Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Regional application of the Gross National Happiness Index in the context of the quality of life in Slovakia

Klamár¹,

Gavaľová²

2018

geogrcas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regional application of the Gross National Happiness Index in the context of the quality of life in Slovakia The paper aims to apply the regional application of the Gross National Happiness Index (GNH Index) in the regions of Slovakia. The GNH Index, using the set of nine domains and several indicators within them, primarily aims to assess the comfort of inhabitants and their subjective happiness in the broader context of the quality of life concept. It points at the fact that the overall prosperity and development in the regions cannot be looked at only from the perspective of economic growth, using the gross domestic product as the most important economic indicator. Moreover, it should be approached in a more complex way. The original methodology of the GNH Index used in Bhutan was adapted to the conditions of Slovakia and its regions. The resulting values of the observed index were confronted, in the interregional comparison, with the values of the regional GDP using the Gini coefficient and coefficient of variation as the basic statistic measures of the assessment.

show abstract

Section: Gross National Happiness Index In the Context Of The Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Gross National Happiness Index In the Context Of The Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Gross National Happiness Index In the Context Of The Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Gross National Happiness Index In the Context Of The Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Achieved Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Regional application of the Gross National Happiness Index in the context of the quality of life in Slovakia

Klamár¹,

Gavaľová²

2018

geogrcas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Quality of life indices: how robust are the results considering different aggregation techniques?

Macků

Barvíř

2022

Journal of Maps

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Change in the quality of life in different countries of the world: Assessment on the EQLS database

Živčicová,

Masárová,

Gullerová

2023

Problems and Perspectives in Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS) is a tool that assesses quality of life across different aspects. Monitoring the quality-of-life indicators in times of crisis and post-crisis is crucial for human resource management as the quality-of-life indicators provide valuable insights into the well-being and needs of employees. The study aimed to examine the impact of social and economic changes on the selected quality of life areas of the EU population by analyzing data from the ESQL of 2016 and 2020. It was found that the average EU life satisfaction score went down. In 2020, the EU optimism average dropped when compared to 2016. According to 2020 survey data, EU citizens found coping with life’s challenges harder than in 2016. The EU average regarding the difficulty of dealing with essential issues in life increased by 1.5% in 2020 compared to 2016. The time needed to get back to normality after some mishaps was also investigated. The EU average regarding subjective feelings of tension rose by 7.4%. In comparison to 2016, depression and downheartedness grew stronger across the EU nations and the EU average in 2020. The average value increased by 6.8%. The changes may provide insights into the effects of social and economic trends on people’s well-being across Europe. AcknowledgmentThe paper is written under the project Multiplier effects of human capital quality on economic performance and competitiveness of the Slovak economy and supported by the Grant Agency VEGA of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic [No. 1/0357/21].

show abstract

Kvalita života v mestách: východiská, prístupy, poznatky

Cited by 9 publications

References 59 publications

Regional application of the Gross National Happiness Index in the context of the quality of life in Slovakia

Regional application of the Gross National Happiness Index in the context of the quality of life in Slovakia

Quality of life indices: how robust are the results considering different aggregation techniques?

Change in the quality of life in different countries of the world: Assessment on the EQLS database

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About