2015
DOI: 10.4102/ids.v49i1.1891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kuyper’s razor? Rethinking science and religion, trinitarian scholarship and God’s eternity

Abstract: This article explores three research fields in contemporary Christian scholarship and argues that the way they are approached is often questionable due to the basic assumptions, the methods or the implications. The following allegations are proposed. Research on the relationship between religion and science is based on a framework of assumptions which does not reflect the biblical standpoint properly. Trinitarian scholarship expects too much from the presumed correspondence between Trinity and created reality,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several of the previous papers have been critical of some aspects of Kuyper's thought; the one from Coletto (2015) applies a Kuyperian approach to three key areas of Christian scholarship: science and religion; Trinitarian scholarship; and God's eternity. In each of these three areas he questions the assumptions on which they are based and maintains that 'Kuyper's razor' would help in a surgical assumption-ectomy and shows how the problems can be cut a different way.…”
Section: Journal Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of the previous papers have been critical of some aspects of Kuyper's thought; the one from Coletto (2015) applies a Kuyperian approach to three key areas of Christian scholarship: science and religion; Trinitarian scholarship; and God's eternity. In each of these three areas he questions the assumptions on which they are based and maintains that 'Kuyper's razor' would help in a surgical assumption-ectomy and shows how the problems can be cut a different way.…”
Section: Journal Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%