1971
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1971.10477241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kurtosis Measures Bimodality?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the wave saturation regime, a redistribution of probability mass into the PDF shoulders is observed. Examples found in Hildebrand (1971) and DeCarlo (1997) for the symmetric Beta distribution illustrates a similar aspect. Note that in Fig.…”
Section: Statistical Moments and Comparison With Literature Datasupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the wave saturation regime, a redistribution of probability mass into the PDF shoulders is observed. Examples found in Hildebrand (1971) and DeCarlo (1997) for the symmetric Beta distribution illustrates a similar aspect. Note that in Fig.…”
Section: Statistical Moments and Comparison With Literature Datasupporting
confidence: 53%
“…DeCarlo (1997) pointed out that a strong negative excess kurtosis might also be used as indicator of PDF bi-modality DeCarlo (1997). However, as pointed out by Hildebrand (1971), although this interpretation may be true, there are counter examples (such as the family of double-Gamma distributions) which oppose this view. A more general interpretation for symmetric distributions could be that a movement of probability mass from or into the shoulders of a distribution into or from its centre or tails implies in changes of its kurtosis.…”
Section: Statistical Momentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, we first transformed the distribution of times to invasion by means of a Box-Cox transformation, which makes the distribution as symmetrical as possible. Significant negative kurtosis in a symmetric distribution means that the shoulders of the distribution are higher than they would be in a normal distribution, and a value beyond (1.2 means significant bimodality (Hildebrand 1971, Wyszomirski 1992. After Box-Cox transformation we found significant negative kurtosis in the distribution of times to invasion (kurtosis0(0.98, SE 00.4, p00.007).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Similarly, the kurtosis indicates the degree of modality versus bimodality, although its meaning is somewhat ambiguous. The traditional interpretation of kurtosis as a measure of "peakedness" has largely shifted among statisticians toward a focus on bimodality, although a stream of research has suggested that the meaning of kurtosis is complex and necessitates caution in its interpretation (Balanda and MacGillivray, 1988;Chissom, 1970;Darlington, 1970;DeCarlo, 1997;Hildebrand, 1971;Moors, 1986;Ruppert, 1987)-a perspective with which we fully concur. By measuring modality versus bimodality, the kurtosis quantifies the extent to which respondents are clustered into two extreme camps, making it an intuitively appealing way to gauge group polarization.…”
Section: Polarization Bimodality and Kurtosismentioning
confidence: 91%