Künftige Königsmacher? Die Europawahl 2019 aus Sicht der Liberalen

Plümer, Sandra; Goldmann, Anne

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-29277-5_5

Die Europawahl 2019 2020

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-29277-5_5

|View full text |Cite

Künftige Königsmacher? Die Europawahl 2019 aus Sicht der Liberalen

Sandra Plümer

Anne Goldmann

Abstract: Der folgende Beitrag beleuchtet die Europawahl 2019 aus Sicht der Liberalen. Dabei wird zunächst der Wahlkampf seitens der Allianz der Liberalen und Demokraten für Europa (ALDE-Partei) geschildert und insbesondere die Auswahl des Spitzenpersonals in den Fokus gerückt. Anschließend werden parteiinterne Dynamiken und Konfliktpotentiale analysiert, die Wahlergebnisse der ALDE-Partei und der liberalen Fraktion Renew Europe (RE) erläutert sowie im Hinblick auf künftige Mehrheitsbildungen reflektiert. Abschließend r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Explaining the reform of the Europarties’ selection procedures for Spitzenkandidaten

Wolfs

Put

Hecke

2021

Journal of European Integration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines how Europarties selected lead candidates (Spitzenkandidaten) for the 2019 European Parliament elections, and investigates why these parties changed or did not change their procedural processes compared with the previous 2014 election. As a set of external and internal factors incentivized Europarties to democratize their selections, the main hypothesis expects more inclusive procedures in 2019. The empirical analysis examines seven parties -EPP, PES, ALDE, EGP, PEL, ACRE and EFA -based on sixteen interviews with high-ranking party officials, internal party documents, and party websites. By leveraging analytical frameworks for the analysis of national parties we first provide a detailed account of these Europarties' selection procedures and subsequently present crucial factors explaining reforms (or lack thereof). The results show that mainly intra-party dissent hampered large democratic reforms. Our findings contribute to scholarly understanding of intraparty decision-making in Europarties, and have important consequences for the role of Europarties in future democratizing efforts of the EU.

show abstract

Explaining the reform of the Europarties’ selection procedures for Spitzenkandidaten

Wolfs

Put

Hecke

2021

Journal of European Integration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Künftige Königsmacher? Die Europawahl 2019 aus Sicht der Liberalen

Cited by 1 publication

References 3 publications

Explaining the reform of the Europarties’ selection procedures for Spitzenkandidaten

Explaining the reform of the Europarties’ selection procedures for Spitzenkandidaten

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About