Kultur und Semantik

Šrubař, Ilja

doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91925-6

Cited by 42 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As Ilja Srubar (1988Srubar ( , 2007Srubar ( , 2009) has convincingly shown, there is more to Schutz than a phenomenological analysis of the intentional processes in the subjective consciousness. Schutz's life-world analysis has not only a subjective but also a pragmatic, social pole:…”

Section: The Phenomenological Life-world Analysismentioning

confidence: 94%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Phenomenological Life-World Analysis and Ethnomethodology’s Program

Eberle

2012

Hum Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper discusses ethnomethodology's program in relation to the phenomenological life-world analysis of Alfred Schutz. A recent publication of Garfinkel's early writings sheds new light on how he made use of phenomenological reflections in order to create a new sociological approach. Garfinkel used Schutz's life-world analysis as a source of inspiration, called for 'misreading' in the sense of an alternate reading and developed a new, empirical approach to the analysis of social order which he called 'ethnomethodology'. Ethnomethodologists usually acknowledge the historical importance of Schutz but emphasize that Garfinkel succeeded to overcome the limitations of phenomenological analyses and moved beyond. This view has spread above all in the Anglosaxon countries. In German sociology, Schutz's life-world analysis still has a much stronger standing than ethnomethodology and is interpreted as a systematic whole. Following Luckmann, it is discussed as a protosociological foundation of the methodology of social sciences or, following Srubar, as a philosophical anthropology with two poles: a subjective and a social, pragmatic pole. Both versions claim to analyze the meaningful constitution of the social world, to serve as a foundation of sociological methodology and to provide guidelines for an 'adequate' sociology. While Garfinkel used phenomenological concepts for sociological analysis, Luckmann clearly distinguishes the two: you either do phenomenology (protosociology) or you do sociology (a theoretically guided, empirical sociology of knowledge). This paper describes the present-day debate in German sociology and compares ethnomethodology's program with these interpretations of Schutz's life-world analysis.

show abstract

Section: The Phenomenological Life-world Analysismentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Srubar (1988Srubar ( , 2007Srubar ( , 2009 systematically carved out these pragmatic aspects and analyzed them in many publications. Consequently, he does not speak of a 'phenomenological life-world analysis' but of Schutz's 'pragmatic life-world theory'.…”

Section: The Phenomenological Life-world Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Phenomenological Life-World Analysis and Ethnomethodology’s Program

Eberle

2012

Hum Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This analysis is completed by examining the concept of frontiers by Moréteau [23] which is implicitly present in the concept of interval. In order to analyse the concept of hybridity, the methodological framework of transdifference developed by Srubar [24] can also be used. [21] The authors explain why the application of the Third Space theory can be challenging in the translation process.…”

Section: Theoretical Aspectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Multiplicity of Third Space of Communication in Law

Matulewska

Wagner

2021

Int J Semiot Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Communication in law provides a space for alternatives, a Third Space, wherein boundaries between various systems are strongly anchored to a country's language, history and societal development. Transfers, modifications, and integrations of such systems into other target languages may result in many effects of distortions and appropriations, reformulations and renewals as well as of misinterpretations in communication. Hence, Third Space is a necessary prerequisite for negotiation, transformation and translation from culture A to culture B, since it operates as a multi-stage dynamic where such mechanisms should be analyzed in a fair and equitable manner. Keyword Third space • Legal translation • Legal interpretation • Legal communication • Intralingual communicationLe droit, comme les autres matières de la connaissance, a été happé par le maelström moderne de la communication [50, p.95] The Multiplicity of Third Spaces in TranslationThe theory of Third Space was developed by Bhabha [1, 2] who addressed issues of communication under colonial contexts. His investigation into the equality of communication reveals that: it is the space of intervention emerging in the cultural interstices that introduces creative invention into existence. And one last time, there is a return to the performance of identity as iteration, the re-creation of the self in the world of travel, the resettlement of the borderline community of migration. [1, p. 9].

show abstract

“…He understands it to be a third dimension of the lifeworld in addition to consciousness and communication. Srubar (2009) 8 coined the concept of the action-thoughtlanguage connection (HDS-Zusammenhang), as these represent three moments of the human approach to the world (Weltzugang) and are, therefore, associated with each other. In addition, following Alfred Schütz, he understands action as Wirken, or interaction with objects and with others, to which the primary structures of experience of the approach to the world trace back.…”

Section: The Problem Of Action In Luhmann's Theory and Its Relation Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of the Phylogenesis and Ontogenesis of Language in Light of Systemic-Functional Linguistics

Calise

2016

Rev. za soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper deals with the problems of phylogenesis and ontogenesis of language, departing from Niklas Luhmann's general hypothesis of the co-evolution of psychic and social systems. Regarding phylogenesis, the focus in Luhmann's theory was placed on the "pre-linguistic medium of communication" constructed by gestures, which would have been the element that stimulated the evolution of language. This sort of communication allows for the emergence of a certain social order. Here, the problem was the impossibility of identifying this social order by one of the primary forms of societal differentiation. An attempt was made to interpret in which societal contexts pre-language "emerges". In order to do this, the author resorted to Michael Halliday's systemic-functional linguistics. Concerning ontogenesis, the attention was directed to the concepts of action and experience. The point of departure was Ilja Srubar's criticism of Luhmann's theory of language, according to which the acquisition of language can be thought of as a process of translating action schemes into linguistic ones. This implies a nativist vision of language discarded by Luhmann and also by Halliday. The latter indicated that it is impossible to talk about translating non-linguistic and pre-linguistic cognition schemes into linguistic form because there is no model of experience previous to the linguistic categories. In addition, an attempt was made to show that systemic-functional linguistics can be useful to fill the gap regarding the ontogenesis of language left by Luhmann's systems theory.

show abstract

Kultur und Semantik

Cited by 42 publications

References 0 publications

Phenomenological Life-World Analysis and Ethnomethodology’s Program

Phenomenological Life-World Analysis and Ethnomethodology’s Program

The Multiplicity of Third Space of Communication in Law

Rethinking Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of the Phylogenesis and Ontogenesis of Language in Light of Systemic-Functional Linguistics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About