2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-82197-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kultur in deutsch-schwedischen Wirtschaftsgesprächen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by critical reflections in neighboring disciplines, especially on the role of cultural attributions in power relations, injustice, and (global) social inequalities, the field of intercultural communication is now beginning to move more decidedly beyond hegemonic essentialism and culturalism. Building on the works of, for example, cultural critic Edward Said (1978Said ( /2003Said ( , 1994 on orientalism, othering, and identity, political scientist Benedict Anderson (2016Anderson ( [1983) on imagined communities, social scientist Michael Billig (1995) on banal nationalism, andanthropologist Brian Street (1993) on culture being a verb, a number of intercultural communication scholars have shown how damaging and patronizing unreflective uses of the term 'culture' can be-especially when it is approached as a determinant or an identifying feature of individuals (see, e.g., Dervin, 2009Dervin, , 2011Dervin, , 2014Dervin, , 2016Ferri, 2018;Holliday, 2011Holliday, , 2013Piller, 2012Piller, , 2017Siegfried, 2005). The understanding is, from this perspective, that the field of intercultural communication should critically consider and perhaps even mitigate its prevalent obsession with cultural differences, which are said to have a straightforward and inadvertently detrimental impact on communication.…”
Section: Toward An Interactive Approach To Interculturality In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by critical reflections in neighboring disciplines, especially on the role of cultural attributions in power relations, injustice, and (global) social inequalities, the field of intercultural communication is now beginning to move more decidedly beyond hegemonic essentialism and culturalism. Building on the works of, for example, cultural critic Edward Said (1978Said ( /2003Said ( , 1994 on orientalism, othering, and identity, political scientist Benedict Anderson (2016Anderson ( [1983) on imagined communities, social scientist Michael Billig (1995) on banal nationalism, andanthropologist Brian Street (1993) on culture being a verb, a number of intercultural communication scholars have shown how damaging and patronizing unreflective uses of the term 'culture' can be-especially when it is approached as a determinant or an identifying feature of individuals (see, e.g., Dervin, 2009Dervin, , 2011Dervin, , 2014Dervin, , 2016Ferri, 2018;Holliday, 2011Holliday, , 2013Piller, 2012Piller, , 2017Siegfried, 2005). The understanding is, from this perspective, that the field of intercultural communication should critically consider and perhaps even mitigate its prevalent obsession with cultural differences, which are said to have a straightforward and inadvertently detrimental impact on communication.…”
Section: Toward An Interactive Approach To Interculturality In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%