“…Inspired by critical reflections in neighboring disciplines, especially on the role of cultural attributions in power relations, injustice, and (global) social inequalities, the field of intercultural communication is now beginning to move more decidedly beyond hegemonic essentialism and culturalism. Building on the works of, for example, cultural critic Edward Said (1978Said ( /2003Said ( , 1994 on orientalism, othering, and identity, political scientist Benedict Anderson (2016Anderson ( [1983) on imagined communities, social scientist Michael Billig (1995) on banal nationalism, andanthropologist Brian Street (1993) on culture being a verb, a number of intercultural communication scholars have shown how damaging and patronizing unreflective uses of the term 'culture' can be-especially when it is approached as a determinant or an identifying feature of individuals (see, e.g., Dervin, 2009Dervin, , 2011Dervin, , 2014Dervin, , 2016Ferri, 2018;Holliday, 2011Holliday, , 2013Piller, 2012Piller, , 2017Siegfried, 2005). The understanding is, from this perspective, that the field of intercultural communication should critically consider and perhaps even mitigate its prevalent obsession with cultural differences, which are said to have a straightforward and inadvertently detrimental impact on communication.…”