1992
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2221710207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kubo Formalism for Resonant Tunneling in Double Barrier Heterostructures

Abstract: The electronic and transport properties of double barrier structures are studied using the Kubo formula for the electrical conductivity and a tight-binding respresentation for the Hamiltonian. The theory is able to reproduce the experimental I -U characteristic curves. A self-consistent Hartree treatment permits to study the charge distribution and its influence on the position of the resonant energy levels and on the tunneling properties as a function of the doping of the sample.Les propri6tCs Clectroniques e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the theoretical results reported by Gonçalves da Silva and Mendez [16] our model predicts resonant biases, which are lower than the observed ones, but in better agreement with experimental results. We believe, that the presence of the barriers modifies the electronic charge distribution of the device affecting the potential profile due to the electron-electron repulsion changing the energy of the resonant channels, and so requiring different values in bias for tunneling [24].…”
Section: B (T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the theoretical results reported by Gonçalves da Silva and Mendez [16] our model predicts resonant biases, which are lower than the observed ones, but in better agreement with experimental results. We believe, that the presence of the barriers modifies the electronic charge distribution of the device affecting the potential profile due to the electron-electron repulsion changing the energy of the resonant channels, and so requiring different values in bias for tunneling [24].…”
Section: B (T)mentioning
confidence: 99%