KUALIFIKASI HUKUM PIDANA KHUSUS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU/PILKADA  (Tinjauan Hukum Administrasi Negara)

Ersan, Paramita; Erliyana, Anna

doi:10.33751/palar.v4i1.781

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the Criminal Procedural Code (KUHAP), one of the institutions authorized to conduct investigations and inquiry is the Indonesian National Police. In addition to the Criminal Procedure Code, the authority of the Indonesian National Police as investigators and inquirers to uncover criminal acts is also reaffirmed in Article 1 section 8 and 9, and Article 14, section 1 In dealing with special crimes, the investigator of the Directorate of Special Crimes must always synergize with other institutions that are related to the particular type of crimes they are handling [2]. For example, in the new Law of Prevention and Eradication of the Criminal Act of Money Laundering (UU PPTPPU), there is a fundamental change related to investigations, namely the granting of authority to investigators of the original criminal acts under the coordination of PPATK to conduct TPPU investigations related to the provenance of the criminal acts (for example, illegal logging) [3].…”

Section: Directorate Of Special Crimes Positionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urgency of Strengthening the Role of Directorate of Special Crimes of Indonesian National Police in The Special Criminal Law Enforcement

Silaban¹

2021

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies, ICILS 2020, July 1st 2020, Semarang, Indonesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The presence of ad hoc institutions in field of law enforcement such as Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Terrorism Prevention National Board (BNPT), and Narcotics National Board (BNN), within the last two decades has been unable to significantly reduce the number of special criminal actions that become the portion of the institutions. Optimal and surging simultaneous law enforcement strategies in all regions of Indonesia has to be immediately formulated and implemented as an anticipation from the increasing number of special criminal cases. The study used normative juridical method. The study reviewed that one of the resources that had an ability and network until district level (Sectoral Police) as the spearhead to prevent the increasing number of special criminal actions was the special criminal and detective range known as Special Crime under Crime and Detective Department of Indonesian National Police. The fact could not be denied in addition to the need of revision of laws related to special criminal actions reinforce Crime and Detective Department tactically and elegantly but effectively in prosecuting special criminal actions. The role reinforcement of Special Criminal Directorate of Indonesian National Police in Order of Criminal Law Enforcement in field of Special Criminal Actions to Maintain State Security and Sovereignty was by reformulation of its institutional and powers in order to maintain state security and sovereignty from Special Criminal Actions.

show abstract

Section: Directorate Of Special Crimes Positionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urgency of Strengthening the Role of Directorate of Special Crimes of Indonesian National Police in The Special Criminal Law Enforcement

Silaban¹

2021

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies, ICILS 2020, July 1st 2020, Semarang, Indonesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1 Menjadi menarik karena dalam konsep hukum pidana, pasti semua tindak pidana adalah merupakan perbuatan tercela, namun tidak semua perbuatan tercela merupakan tindak pidana. 2 Di Indonesia subtansi hukum pidana 3 dapat ditemukan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHPidana). 4 Asas yang paling penting dalam KUHPidana ini adalah asas legalitas, yang bermakna bahwa: "moniat lex, priusquam feriat," artinya undang-undang harus memberikan peringatan terlebih dahulu sebelum merealisasikan ancaman yang terkandung di dalamnya.…”

Section: A Pendahuluanunclassified

“…7 Asas legalitas sangat penting dan sentral dalam hukum pidana di Indonesia, sebab itu diatur dalam KUHPidana, asas legalitas ini berasal dari doktrin nullum delictum nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali (tiada tindak pidana dan tiada pidana tanpa sebelumnya ditetapkan 1 Norma Pasal 7A UUD 1945, sebagai berikut: "Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden dapat diberhentikan dalam masa jabatannya oleh Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat atas usul Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, baik apabila terbukti telah melakukan pelanggaran hukum berupa penghianatan terhadap negara, korupsi, penyuapan dan tindak pidana berat lainnya, atau perbuatan tercela maupun apabila terbukti tidak lagi memenuhi syarat sebagai Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presdien." 2 Penjelasan ini didapat dari Schaffmeister, Keijzer, dan Sutorius. Baca lebih lanjut buku Sofyan, A., & Azisa, N. (2016).…”

Section: A Pendahuluanunclassified

Perbuatan Tercela Sebagai Salah Satu Alasan Pemakzulan Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia

Irham

Mulyati

2021

SASI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to find out what is meant by the President and/or Vice President committing a disgraceful act in the concept of criminal law, so that they can be impeached. By using normative legal research and approaches to legal concepts, laws and their history. The results of the research are as follows: First, all actions that are contrary to the Criminal Code are disgraceful acts for the President/Vice President; Second, the religious values, social culture of the Indonesian nation, as well as moral principles in the Criminal Code have been compiled in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, therefore any deviation from the behavior of the President/Vice President against the 1945 Constitution is a despicable act; Third, all disgraceful acts of the President/Vice President that violate criminal law offenses are subject to criminal sanctions in accordance with the Criminal Code, so that disgraceful acts that have been formally regulated in the Criminal Code are not the meaning of disgraceful acts as referred to in Article 7A of the 1945 Constitution, because the limitations of criminal acts have been determined can impeach the President/Vice President, namely: corruption, bribery, and other serious crimes; Fourth, the disgraceful act of the President/Vice President in Article 7A of the 1945 Constitution is an act of violating the 1945 Constitution as a reference to the rules of criminal law.

show abstract

“…Thus, it can be interpreted that electoral crimes are all forms of sanctions imposed due to fraud that occurs during the election process. Topo Santoso also mentioned that there has been an increase in developments in electoral crimes that include the wider scope of electoral crimes, an increase in the types of criminal acts and an increase in criminal (Ersan & Erliyana, 2018). Almost in every election period, always tinged with electoral crimes, including the simultaneous elections in 2019.…”

Section: A the Problem Of Election Disputes In Simultaneous Electionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Initiating a Permanent Electoral Body to Resolve Dignified Election Disputes: Assessing the Effectiveness of Gakkumdu

Esfandiari

Al-Fatih

2020

yst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to evaluate ineffectiveness in the process of resolving electoral disputes through Gakkumdu in simultaneous elections in 2019. However, in practice there are difficulties in handling the consequences of criminal norms and technical rules which are not clearly formulated, causing differences of opinion in resolving election disputes. The approach method used by the author with normative juridical approach method (legal Research) through literature study using primary legal data namely Law Number 7 of 2017 on Elections, KPU Regulation and Court Decision related to elections. Secondary data, especially library materials containing information about election dispute problems through Gakkumdu. The collection of legal materials is carried out by tracing the library in the form of information about the evaluation of gakkumdu's role in resolving the dispute of the 2019 Elections and in analysis using the method of descriptive analysis. The results of this study concluded that Gakkumdu which is an organ formed based on the mandate of Law Number 7 of 2017 on Elections, has not worked optimally. It is very vulnerable to overlap of authority between Bawaslu, The Police and the Prosecutor's Office. On the other hand, this organ has the opportunity to reduce the authority and independence of Bawaslu, which has been supervising the elections. The combination of the three institutions organically and substantive has not been able to parse the dispute of the 2019 elections.

show abstract

KUALIFIKASI HUKUM PIDANA KHUSUS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU/PILKADA (Tinjauan Hukum Administrasi Negara)

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Urgency of Strengthening the Role of Directorate of Special Crimes of Indonesian National Police in The Special Criminal Law Enforcement

Urgency of Strengthening the Role of Directorate of Special Crimes of Indonesian National Police in The Special Criminal Law Enforcement

Perbuatan Tercela Sebagai Salah Satu Alasan Pemakzulan Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia

Initiating a Permanent Electoral Body to Resolve Dignified Election Disputes: Assessing the Effectiveness of Gakkumdu

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About