1985
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-15641-0_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kth power-free codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, taking c = b, and s = ε in a first time and p = ε in a second time, we obtain that a ps-morphism is a bifix morphism. Lemma 1.6 [6,7] If f is not a ps-morphism then f is not a k-power-free morphism for every integer k ≥ 2.…”
Section: Given An Integermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Obviously, taking c = b, and s = ε in a first time and p = ε in a second time, we obtain that a ps-morphism is a bifix morphism. Lemma 1.6 [6,7] If f is not a ps-morphism then f is not a k-power-free morphism for every integer k ≥ 2.…”
Section: Given An Integermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus a 3 2 -power-free word is a 3-anti-power word (but the converse does not hold). Thus a Dejean's word [4,3,8] over a four-letter alphabet, which does not contain any ℓ-power with ℓ > 7 5 -power-free, is a 3-anti-power word. More generally, a non-k-anti-power word (among k consecutive factors of the same length of this word, at least two of them are equal) contains at least one fractionnal ℓ-power with ℓ ≥ k k−1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation