Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3511095.3531276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kronecker Decomposition for Knowledge Graph Embeddings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the most recent DBpedia 2021 benchmark dataset 3 to evaluate our framework in depth. Our experiments suggest that a state-of-the-art KGE model with more than 11.4B parameters can be successfully trained and applied in link prediction, and relation prediction 4 . We refer to the project page for the details and log files about pretrained models.…”
Section: Summary Of Initial Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used the most recent DBpedia 2021 benchmark dataset 3 to evaluate our framework in depth. Our experiments suggest that a state-of-the-art KGE model with more than 11.4B parameters can be successfully trained and applied in link prediction, and relation prediction 4 . We refer to the project page for the details and log files about pretrained models.…”
Section: Summary Of Initial Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Scholarly Publications: Our framework have been effectively used to learn knowledge graphs embeddings in several published works [13], [3], [14], [4], [15], [16], and [17].…”
Section: Software Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scholarly Publications: Our framework have been effectively used to learn knowledge graphs embeddings in several published works [3,4,[13][14][15][16], and [17].…”
Section: Software Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the triples (Barack, Married, Michelle) and (𝙼𝚒𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚎, 𝙷𝚊𝚜𝙲𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚍, 𝙼𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚊) ∈ , a good scoring function is expected to return high scores for (Barack, HasChild, Malia) and (Michelle, Married, Barack), while returning a considerably lower score for (Malia, HasChild, Barack). To compute a single score, embeddings of entities and relations are retrieved from 𝐄, 𝐑 and trilinear d-dimension vector multiplication is performed, i.e., 𝜙(𝙱𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚔, 𝙷𝚊𝚜𝙲𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚍, 𝙼𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚊) = 𝐁𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐤 • 𝐇𝐚𝐬𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝 ⋅ 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐚 (see [4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%