1977
DOI: 10.1016/0022-314x(77)90066-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kronecker classes of algebraic number fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
46
0
10

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
46
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) n = 5, G(3f)=A 5 , U^A A , V~S 3 The Kronecker equivalence of two extensions L and K of k is equivalent to a group theoretic condition; namely if M : k is a Galois extension containing L and K as intermediate fields and if G is the Galois group of M : k and U, V are the fixed groups of K and L respectively, then it is shown in [3, §1] that K and L are Kronecker equivalent over k if and only if U G = V G where, for a subgroup H of G, H G denotes the set theoretic union \J g€G H g . This group theoretic condition is studied in Section 2; the group theoretic analogue, Theorem 2, of Theorem 1, is proved there and Theorem 1 is deduced from it.…”
Section: Suppose That a Kronecker Class X Relative To K Contains A Fimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(a) n = 5, G(3f)=A 5 , U^A A , V~S 3 The Kronecker equivalence of two extensions L and K of k is equivalent to a group theoretic condition; namely if M : k is a Galois extension containing L and K as intermediate fields and if G is the Galois group of M : k and U, V are the fixed groups of K and L respectively, then it is shown in [3, §1] that K and L are Kronecker equivalent over k if and only if U G = V G where, for a subgroup H of G, H G denotes the set theoretic union \J g€G H g . This group theoretic condition is studied in Section 2; the group theoretic analogue, Theorem 2, of Theorem 1, is proved there and Theorem 1 is deduced from it.…”
Section: Suppose That a Kronecker Class X Relative To K Contains A Fimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence V contains an element h of type 2 2 moving the point 5. Since V contains no elements of type 2 3 and since h centralizes g we must have h = (12)(56) so that V contains (56). Similarly V contains (34) and hence V contains (12)(34)(56) which is a contradiction.…”
Section: Suppose That a Kronecker Class X Relative To K Contains A Fimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…See [19], [17], [12, Section 19.5]. This condition has also been investigated (independently of its number theoretical context) by various group theorists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%