2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40573-019-00092-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kritisches Denken im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht – Synergiemodell, Problemlage und Desiderata

Abstract: Zusammenfassung Kritisches Denken (KD) gilt weitläufig als ein fundamentales Bildungsziel. In naturwissenschaftsdidaktischer Literatur wird diskutiert, dass KD einen Rahmen für die Auseinandersetzung mit den Konzepten Socio-Scientific Issues und Nature of Science bildet. Dennoch fehlt in der Naturwissenschaftsdidaktik ein einvernehmliches Verständnis des Konstrukts KD, was die Weiterentwicklung des Forschungsgebietes und die Implementierung in den naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht erschwert. Das hier vorgeste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Real-life intersections between science and society have been identified as SSI within the science education community already ( Zeidler, 2014 ). Previous research has documented that SSI teaching and learning can have a positive impact on the science content learning of students ( Klosterman and Sadler, 2010 ), on their understanding of the nature of science ( Khishfe et al, 2017 ), and on their argumentation ( Romine and Sadler, 2016 ), and the development of critical thinking skills ( Sadler et al, 2007 ; Rafolt et al, 2019a ). Overall, Hancock et al (2019) emphasized that “SSI-based instruction has emerged as an effective way for students to contextualize their science learning within a complex social and political context.” However, the implementation of SSI-based teaching in the every-day classroom remains limited because SSI instruction may be unfamiliar for many teachers ( Ekborg et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-life intersections between science and society have been identified as SSI within the science education community already ( Zeidler, 2014 ). Previous research has documented that SSI teaching and learning can have a positive impact on the science content learning of students ( Klosterman and Sadler, 2010 ), on their understanding of the nature of science ( Khishfe et al, 2017 ), and on their argumentation ( Romine and Sadler, 2016 ), and the development of critical thinking skills ( Sadler et al, 2007 ; Rafolt et al, 2019a ). Overall, Hancock et al (2019) emphasized that “SSI-based instruction has emerged as an effective way for students to contextualize their science learning within a complex social and political context.” However, the implementation of SSI-based teaching in the every-day classroom remains limited because SSI instruction may be unfamiliar for many teachers ( Ekborg et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not only is science influenced by values, every person has values, and decisions cannot be purely objective, because (3) affectivity plays a role, and subjective judgments (e.g., [15]) and personal values must be taken into account for action decisions as suggested by many health behavior models (e.g., [24,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] ), as summarized in [23]. Finally, one needs (4) critical thinking to be able to reflect one's point of view, question information critically, and be able to change perspectives (e.g., [63,64]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. Hitchcock, 2018;OECD, 2019;Rafolt et al, 2019). Der Begriff selbst entzieht sich allerdings durch seine Vielschichtigkeit einer einheitlichen Definition.…”
Section: Theoretische Betrachtung Des Begriffes Critical Thinkingunclassified