Krimmigration: die Verwobenheit strafrechtlicher mit migrationsrechtlicher Kontrolle unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Pre-Crime-Rechts für „Gefährder“

Future citizens between interest and ability: A systematic literature review of the naturalization and crimmigration scholarship

“…Since the inception of the term, crimmigration scholarship has evolved into two main pillars of research: One focusing on the concept itself examining its origins and proliferation through legal structures as well as the public and political discourse and law enforcement (Coutin, 2011; Pickett, 2016; Sklansky, 2012; Van der Woude et al, 2014; Van der Woude and Van Berlo, 2015) and another studying the impact of crimmigration on the treatment of non-citizens by the criminal justice system (Aas, 2014; Armenta, 2016, 2017; Beckett and Evans, 2015; Bosworth et al, 2018; Chacon, 2015; Kirk and Wakefield, 2018; Ryo, 2016; Stumpf, 2011). Contemporary crimmigration scholarship still centers around the North American context with a growing number of studies examining the expansion of crimmigration to other Western democratic states such as the Netherlands, Norway and Germany, which limits the scope of this review (Aas, 2014; Graebsch, 2019; Van der Woude et al, 2014; Van der Woude and Van Berlo, 2015).…”

“…2 The review does not restrict itself to referring only to the top 30 most cited pieces, but will also supplement these works with more recent scholarship that simply has not had enough time since its publishing to garner the number of citations a paper from the early 2010s might. These papers are predominantly chosen by their unique positioning within the literature such as Graebsch’s 2019 article on crimmigration in Germany being one of the first of its kind. This way, the review follows a semi-structured approach guided by citation statistics and bibliometric-based visualizations in order to accurately reflect the state of art.…”

“…As Aas observes in her study of the Norwegian criminal justice system, crimmigration functions to produce a differentiation between citizens and non-citizens resulting in a 'more exclusionary penal culture directed at non-citizens ' (2014: 521). This consequence manifests itself in the differing procedural treatment and standard of rights afforded non-citizens compared to citizens (Aas, 2014;Graebsch, 2019). Through these developments non-citizens are made deportable.…”

“…Through these developments non-citizens are made deportable. Their status, whilst allowing them to stay within state territory, remains precarious due to the constant possibility of status revocation (Graebsch, 2019). At the same time, deportability also acts as an incentive for immigrants to aspire to naturalization.…”