2016
DOI: 10.5194/essd-2016-52
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KRILLBASE: a circumpolar database of Antarctic krill and salp numerical densities, 1926–2016

Abstract: Abstract. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) and salps are major macroplankton contributors to Southern Ocean food webs and krill are also fished commercially. Managing this fishery sustainably, against a backdrop of rapid regional climate change, requires information on distribution and time trends. Many data on the abundance of both taxa have been obtained from net sampling surveys since 1926, but much of this is stored in national archives, sometimes only in notebooks. In order to make these important data… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More effective engagement with other research communities, such as the climate science, meteorology, glaciology, terrestrial biogeochemistry and paleoclimate communities will be critical in defining the most important external controls on the WAP marine environment, the key fluxes into and out of the system, and the longer-term context of the changes underway. Improvements in data accessibility across disciplines and national programs is also called for, following the examples of the Palmer LTER project (http://pal.lternet.edu/data), the KRILLBASE database for zooplankton survey data (Atkinson et al 2017) and the Surface Ocean CO 2 Atlas (Bakker et al 2016). Widespread adoption of similar data policies and practices across the international community, and efficient linking of existing publicly available databases, for example using the SOOSmap online data portal (http://www.soos.aq/data/soosmap), would be of significant benefit.…”
Section: Closing Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More effective engagement with other research communities, such as the climate science, meteorology, glaciology, terrestrial biogeochemistry and paleoclimate communities will be critical in defining the most important external controls on the WAP marine environment, the key fluxes into and out of the system, and the longer-term context of the changes underway. Improvements in data accessibility across disciplines and national programs is also called for, following the examples of the Palmer LTER project (http://pal.lternet.edu/data), the KRILLBASE database for zooplankton survey data (Atkinson et al 2017) and the Surface Ocean CO 2 Atlas (Bakker et al 2016). Widespread adoption of similar data policies and practices across the international community, and efficient linking of existing publicly available databases, for example using the SOOSmap online data portal (http://www.soos.aq/data/soosmap), would be of significant benefit.…”
Section: Closing Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have created a database, entitled "KRILLBASE-abundance 31 ", to rescue and collate all available data from untargeted net catches across the Southern Ocean. It was compiled through "data rescue" from old notebooks, the authors' datasets, published reports and submissions by other data contributors.…”
Section: Krillbase Abundance Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen efficient sampling combination was a night-time haul with an 8 m 2 net from 0-200 m on 1 January. The statistical method of adjusting the krill density values to this sampling method, including model coefficients and sensitivity analysis, are described is previous papers 31,32 .…”
Section: Transformation and Screening Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salp observations for comparison were obtained from KRILLBASE and Loeb and Santora (2012). KRILLBASE is a freely available database containing S. thompsoni numerical densities in the Southern Ocean, spanning from 1926 to 2016 (Atkinson et al, 2017). Biomass index (i.e.…”
Section: Model Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%