2019
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences9010036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kriging with a Small Number of Data Points Supported by Jack-Knifing, a Case Study in the Sava Depression (Northern Croatia)

Abstract: The semivariogram and the ordinary kriging analyses of porosity data from the Sava Depression (Northern Croatia), are presented relative to the Croatian part of the Pannonian Basin system. The data are taken from hydrocarbon reservoirs of the Lower Pontian (Upper Miocene) age, which belong to the Kloštar Ivanić Formation. The original datasets had been jack-knifed with the purpose of re-sampling and calculating the more reliable semivariograms. The results showed that such improvements can assist in the interp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the interpolation results for the "K" reservoir (see Figure 9, IDW, quantitates) clearly showed "bull's-eye" or "butterfly" effects. Such features are usually observed in small datasets, and need to be carefully interpreted, neglected or re-calculated (e.g., [28]). A disadvantage of the IDW could be linear scaling applied in transition zones between two measured points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the interpolation results for the "K" reservoir (see Figure 9, IDW, quantitates) clearly showed "bull's-eye" or "butterfly" effects. Such features are usually observed in small datasets, and need to be carefully interpreted, neglected or re-calculated (e.g., [28]). A disadvantage of the IDW could be linear scaling applied in transition zones between two measured points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the interpolation results for the "K" reservoir ( Figure 9) showed, so called, "bull-eye" or "butterfly" effect. Such features are usually observed in the small datasets, and need to be carefully interpreted, neglected or re-calculated (e.g., [26]). The disadvantage of the IDW could be mapping of the large transition zones with linear scaling, what could happen only in the almost totally homogeneous reservoir, without faulting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The section also reveals a partial structural inversion within the formation, where monocline of deeper members is transformed into the syncline in the upper part. Figure 2 with reservoir boundaries marked by blue line (from [18]).…”
Section: Geological Settings Of the Analysed Field "B" (Sava Depressimentioning
confidence: 99%