2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2013.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kriging metamodeling for approximation of high-dimensional wave and surge responses in real-time storm/hurricane risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As soon as the kriging metamodel is established based on this database, it can be then used to efficiently predict the responses for any other θ desired. Calculation of b s m i x ð Þ and σ 2 i x ð Þ can be also vectorized, 36 something that will be leveraged in the numerical optimization discussed in the next section.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As soon as the kriging metamodel is established based on this database, it can be then used to efficiently predict the responses for any other θ desired. Calculation of b s m i x ð Þ and σ 2 i x ð Þ can be also vectorized, 36 something that will be leveraged in the numerical optimization discussed in the next section.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the metamodel can be improved primarily by increasing the number of support points n m or by their proper selection (Picheny et al 2010). Other potential strategies for such performance improvement could be the change of the correlation function or the basis functions (Jia and Taflanidis 2013).…”
Section: Validation Of Metamodelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A specific consequence measure utilized in a variety of different risk applications, for example, within system reliability analysis or life-cycle cost estimation (Ellingwood 2001;Goulet et al 2007;Jia and Taflanidis 2013), is the probability that some response quantity z k (e.g., peak interstory drift for a structure) will exceed some thresholdˇk that determines acceptable performance. For certain applications, for example, within seismic risk assessment, where this concept can be used to represent the fragility of system components, it is common to incorporate a prediction error in this definition (Porter et al 2006;Taflanidis et al 2013b); this can be equivalently considered as the aforementioned threshold corresponding to an uncertain quantity with some chosen distribution (this distribution ultimately determines the cumulative distribution function for the component fragilities).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed introductions to the Kriging interpolation procedure can be found in many existing publications [35][36][37][38]. In the Kriging system, the response Y(x) is expressed as the following regression model: x ,x ,...,x n = x with x R p i ∈ , P is the number of the design variables.…”
Section: Kriging Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach is quite complicated in its mathematical form. Kriging is a response surface method for spatial data interpolation and is widely used in the area of geology and aerology research [35][36][37][38]. Kriging uses spatial relationships of known points and their distribution to predict an unknown point, and it is a statistical, unbiased, and minimum variance predictor in which errors can be determined at specified points.…”
Section: The Rom Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%