1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01032690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kriging in a global neighborhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(7) refers to ordinary kriging, and when M contains the trend model, it is universal kriging or kriging with external drift. The formulation of (5) as an alternative to the standard kriging form (7) was also proposed by Davis and Grivet (1984). This form takes advantage of the explicit use of the symmetric positive definite form of K. The inverse of K can be achieved in a more efficient and stable computation using Cholesky factorisation.…”
Section: Blupmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(7) refers to ordinary kriging, and when M contains the trend model, it is universal kriging or kriging with external drift. The formulation of (5) as an alternative to the standard kriging form (7) was also proposed by Davis and Grivet (1984). This form takes advantage of the explicit use of the symmetric positive definite form of K. The inverse of K can be achieved in a more efficient and stable computation using Cholesky factorisation.…”
Section: Blupmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kriging generated a near continuous grid of georeferenced points (26,208 geospatial points on 0.05 Â 0.05 km grid) within the West African region. All 26,208 geospatial points are considered in estimating residuals and the predicted CFR for each geospatial point covering districts with both recorded and unrecorded estimates (Davis and Grivet, 1984). The kriged residuals were then added to the kriged predicted CFR adjusted for imputation from the BRT model to produce a best linear unbiased predicted isopleth (i.e.…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9], an alternative solution was introduced which is called moving window or local neighbourhood kriging where a circular or elliptic moving window centred on the prediction location is used to select the observations within its boundaries that are to used for prediction. It is pointed out in [10] that local neighbourhoods can produce spurious behaviour, this happens particularly when we cross boundaries as new observations are introduced and removed from the moving window.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the computation necessary to invert a matrix grows as O n 3 , it can be seen that a naïve implementation of kriging is not feasible for large datasets. An additional problem that can arise with large datasets is due to instabilities associated with solving large systems of equations [10,11] particularly when the ratio of the highest eigenvalue to the lowest eigenvalue of the covariance matrix becomes large (ill-conditioning). Concerns about the large linear systems involved in kriging and the instabilities in their solutions has motivated a search for better methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%