2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70209-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and PTEN mutations: implications for targeted therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
466
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(478 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
9
466
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharmacological parameters such as the area under the curve (AUC) or the percentage of cell growth inhibition at a clinically relevant drug concentration of 10 mg ml À 1 (ref. 22) closely paralleled the response rates observed in patients 20,21 ( Supplementary Fig. 3a).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pharmacological parameters such as the area under the curve (AUC) or the percentage of cell growth inhibition at a clinically relevant drug concentration of 10 mg ml À 1 (ref. 22) closely paralleled the response rates observed in patients 20,21 ( Supplementary Fig. 3a).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab or panitumumab are approved to treat metastatic CRC but achieve o10% objective response rates in unselected CRC patients when given in monotherapy 20 . Clinical benefit to EGFR blockade is confined to 25% of cases carrying tumours wild-type for KRAS, NRAS and BRAF 21 . To assess whether CRC lines recapitulated the above pharmacogenetic relationships, we determined sensitivity to cetuximab in the entire cell collection over a wide range of drug concentrations (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 PIK3CA mutation has further been associated with poor survival in resectable stage I to III colon cancer, with the adverse effect of PIK3CA mutation potentially limited to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. 14 PIK3CA mutations have been associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in several studies, 15,16 but not in others. 17 The reasons for the discrepancy are not clear.…”
Section: Explanatory Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Unlike in CML, activating mutations of PI3K and KRAS oncogenes are present in a significant proportion of CRC patients and are associated with resistance to EGFR targeted therapy and tumour aggressiveness. 54,62 Constitutive PI3K signalling should inhibit autophagy via mTORC1 (ref 9 ), whereas KRAS mutations are predicted to either inhibit (via PI3K/mTORC1) or activate autophagy. 37 As a result, we first investigated whether EGFR targeted therapy could Cetuximab concentrations and LC3B levels were detected by immunoblotting.…”
Section: Autophagy Is Not Induced Upon Rtk Inhibition Due To Constitumentioning
confidence: 99%