2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.17.454531
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KoT: an automatic implementation of theK/θmethod for species delimitation

Abstract: K/θ is a method to delineate species that rests on the calculation of the ratio between the average distance K separating two putative species-level clades and the genetic diversity θ of these clades. Although this method is explicitly rooted in population genetic theory, it was never benchmarked due to the absence of a program allowing automated analyses. For the same reason, its application by hand was limited to small datasets of a few tens of sequences. We present an automatic implementation of the K/θ met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance-based methods included three approaches: (1) a non-threshold method that uses a hierarchical clustering algorithm to identify a barcode gap (i.e. difference between intra and interspecific genetic distances)—ASAP (Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning 67 ), (2) a threshold method that calculates the ratio between the average interspecific distance ( K ) of two clades and their intraspecific genetic diversity (θ)—KoT (K/θ 84 ), and (3) Barcode Index Number (BIN), which is an algorithm implemented in Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD; https://www.boldsystems.org/ ), where the newly submitted COI sequences are aligned and compared pairwise and also to each sequence already deposited in BOLD. The tree-based methods included three approaches: (1) a non-threshold method that distinguishes coalescent versus speciation processes on a phylogram assuming a Poisson distribution—PTP (Poisson Tree Processes 85 ), (2) a non-threshold method that determines the transition between species-level to population-level evolutionary processes by using a generalized Yule model—GMYC (Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent 86 ), and (3) a proposed molecular threshold for crustaceans which assumes that clades separated by a patristic distance of at least 0.16 substitutions per site at the COI locus are likely different species—PDT (Patristic Distance Threshold 70 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance-based methods included three approaches: (1) a non-threshold method that uses a hierarchical clustering algorithm to identify a barcode gap (i.e. difference between intra and interspecific genetic distances)—ASAP (Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning 67 ), (2) a threshold method that calculates the ratio between the average interspecific distance ( K ) of two clades and their intraspecific genetic diversity (θ)—KoT (K/θ 84 ), and (3) Barcode Index Number (BIN), which is an algorithm implemented in Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD; https://www.boldsystems.org/ ), where the newly submitted COI sequences are aligned and compared pairwise and also to each sequence already deposited in BOLD. The tree-based methods included three approaches: (1) a non-threshold method that distinguishes coalescent versus speciation processes on a phylogram assuming a Poisson distribution—PTP (Poisson Tree Processes 85 ), (2) a non-threshold method that determines the transition between species-level to population-level evolutionary processes by using a generalized Yule model—GMYC (Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent 86 ), and (3) a proposed molecular threshold for crustaceans which assumes that clades separated by a patristic distance of at least 0.16 substitutions per site at the COI locus are likely different species—PDT (Patristic Distance Threshold 70 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A median-joining haplotype network (haplonet) was constructed using HaplowebMaker (Spöri & Flot 2020) based on the COI sequence alignment, including in total 251 COI Corbicula sequences. The K/θ method is based on a comparison between intergroup and intragroup sequence diversity (Birky et al 2010;Birky 2013;Birky & Maughan 2021) as implemented in the online tool KoT (Spöri et al 2022). This method defines a new species when the gap between two clades cannot be caused by genetic drift (based on a threshold) and was shown efficient on asexual or clonal organisms (e.g.…”
Section: Sequence Editing Alignment and Species Delimitation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The K/θ method is based on a comparison between intergroup and intragroup sequence diversity (Birky et al . 2010; Birky 2013; Birky & Maughan, 2021) as implemented in the online tool KoT (Spöri & Flot, 2021). This method defines a new species when the gap between two clades cannot be caused by genetic drift (based on a threshold) and was shown efficient on asexual or clonal organisms ( e .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A median-joining haplotype network (haplonet) was constructed using HaplowebMaker (Spöri et al 2020) based on the COI sequence alignment, including in total 251 COI Corbicula sequences. The K/θ method is based on a comparison between intergroup and intragroup sequence diversity (Birky et al 2010;Birky 2013;Birky & Maughan, 2021) as implemented in the online tool KoT (Spöri & Flot, 2021). This method defines a new species when the gap between two clades cannot be caused by genetic drift (based on a threshold) and was shown efficient on asexual or clonal organisms (e.g.…”
Section: Because Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers Potentially Have Different Inheritance Patterns Inmentioning
confidence: 99%