2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kostenki 1 and the early Upper Paleolithic of Eastern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3). The geological context of the Kostenki archaeological material has been the subject of considerable research over many decades, and is now generally well understood (Rogachev 1957;Lazukov 1982;Holliday et al 2007;Velichko et al 2009;Sedov et al 2010;Sinitsyn 2014;Hoffecker et al 2016). The older archaeological assemblages lie within and between two paleosol complexes, traditionally called the Upper Humic Bed (UHB) and the stratigraphically lower Lower Humic Bed (LHB).…”
Section: Kostenki and The Early Streletskianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). The geological context of the Kostenki archaeological material has been the subject of considerable research over many decades, and is now generally well understood (Rogachev 1957;Lazukov 1982;Holliday et al 2007;Velichko et al 2009;Sedov et al 2010;Sinitsyn 2014;Hoffecker et al 2016). The older archaeological assemblages lie within and between two paleosol complexes, traditionally called the Upper Humic Bed (UHB) and the stratigraphically lower Lower Humic Bed (LHB).…”
Section: Kostenki and The Early Streletskianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three, however, have question marks over their chronostratigraphic position within the Kostenki sequence and/or their status as unmixed assemblages. Layer V of Kostenki 1 is the only assemblage to contain numerous Streletskian points, but doubts have persisted about the pre-ash age of the largest Layer V lithic collection, and more generally about whether "Layer V" in different parts of the site represents the same stratigraphic entity (Anikovich 1977a;Bradley et al 1995;Anikovich et al 2006Anikovich et al , 2008Hoffecker et al 2016). Kostenki 6 has been suggested to have contained a mixture of different assemblages, and the pre-ash age of at least some archaeological material has been questioned (Praslov 1976;Rogachev and Anikovich 1982b;Anikovich 1992).…”
Section: Kostenki and The Early Streletskianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Некоторые из них вмещены в выраженные в профиле почвы или горизонты эфемерного почвообразования [Аникович 1993;Седов и др. 2010;Hoffecker et al 2016].…”
Section: Sn Lisit Synunclassified
“…На Борщёво 5 зафиксировано два горизонта почвообразования, оба вмещают граветтийские артефакты. По меньшей мере, одна четко выраженная палеопочва (гмелинская) выделяется на уровне залегания слоев эпохи граветта на Костёнках 1, Костёнках 21 и, возможно, на Костёнках 11 (Праслов, Рогачёв /ред./ 1982;Попов, Пустовалов 2004;Hoffecker et al 2016). Следовательно, по крайней мере на ряде памятников эпохи граветта, периоды обитания были связаны с эпизодами стабилизации дневной поверхности, благоприятными с точки зрения почвообразования.…”
Section: стратиграфическая и геоморфологическая корреляцияunclassified