1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.74.4096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Korolev and Liberman Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of the vector polarization of the deuteron beam has been performed using the events from the reaction dp −→ ppn [40]. The deuteron beam polarization averaged over two polarization modes has been estimated as p y = 0.488 ± 0.061 by measuring the azimuthal asymmetry of quasi-elastic scattering using the known data on the analyzing powers for the elastic np-and ppscattering [41,42] The dp-elastic scattering events as a function of the scattering angle θ * .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the vector polarization of the deuteron beam has been performed using the events from the reaction dp −→ ppn [40]. The deuteron beam polarization averaged over two polarization modes has been estimated as p y = 0.488 ± 0.061 by measuring the azimuthal asymmetry of quasi-elastic scattering using the known data on the analyzing powers for the elastic np-and ppscattering [41,42] The dp-elastic scattering events as a function of the scattering angle θ * .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( f ) Oscillating U z Cloud parcels in stable layers may perform random or periodic uctuations related to turbulence, gravity waves, or Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. The effect of the vertical uctuations on the formation of droplet size spectra in liquid clouds was discussed in detail by Korolev (1995). Such uctuations may completely change the scenario (Fig.…”
Section: (E) Variation Of Ice Water Fraction In a Uniformly Verticallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36] The intermediate fields (B $ 10 5 T) were less explored but focused mostly on the triplet state 3 R u [37,38] and only two studies of qualitative character existed which investigated the potential energy curve of the lowest 1 R g state. [39,40] It was proposed [34] that this triplet state was the molecular ground state in superstrong magnetic field. However, this theory was based on an incorrect assumption [41] which was clear after the investigation [35,41] of the formation of the triplet state 3 P u in superstrong fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%