2024
DOI: 10.1109/access.2024.3399839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Korean Sign Language Alphabet Recognition Through the Integration of Handcrafted and Deep Learning-Based Two-Stream Feature Extraction Approach

Jungpil Shin,
Abu Saleh Musa Miah,
Yuto Akiba
et al.

Abstract: Recognizing sign language plays a crucial role in improving communication accessibility for the Deaf and hard-of-hearing communities. In Korea, many individuals facing hearing and speech challenges depend on Korean Sign Language (KSL) as their primary means of communication. Many researchers have been working to develop a sign language recognition system for other sign languages, but little research has been done for KSL alphabet recognition. However, existing KSL recognition systems have faced significant per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have utilized various datasets, tools and techniques to make a system for AD classification. Recently, researchers have focused on two main approaches for training and classifying models, conventional learning and deep learning, as they proved excellent in other domains [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Recent studies like [ 24 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] used conventional learning for AD classification, while studies like [ 5 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] employed deep learning techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have utilized various datasets, tools and techniques to make a system for AD classification. Recently, researchers have focused on two main approaches for training and classifying models, conventional learning and deep learning, as they proved excellent in other domains [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Recent studies like [ 24 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] used conventional learning for AD classification, while studies like [ 5 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] employed deep learning techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%