2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.88.052501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Koopmans’ condition in self-interaction-corrected density-functional theory

Abstract: We investigate from a practitioner's point of view the computation of the ionization potential (IP) within density functional theory (DFT). DFT with (semi-)local energy-density functionals is plagued by a self-interaction error which hampers the computation of IP from the single-particle energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO). The problem may be cured by a self interaction correction (SIC) for which there exist various approximate treatments. We compare the performance of the SIC proposed by P… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a full SIC treatment is computationally cumbersome [38], we use it in a simplified, but reliable and efficient version as an average density SIC (ADSIC) [39]. The ADSIC suffices to put the single-particle energies into right relation to continuum threshold such that the ionization potential (IP) is correctly reproduced in a great variety of systems [40] from simple atoms to large organic molecules. In this context, a correct description of IP is crucial for photoemission excited by external fields, in particular by strong fields as it is assumed to be dominated by electrons in the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) [41].…”
Section: Formal Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a full SIC treatment is computationally cumbersome [38], we use it in a simplified, but reliable and efficient version as an average density SIC (ADSIC) [39]. The ADSIC suffices to put the single-particle energies into right relation to continuum threshold such that the ionization potential (IP) is correctly reproduced in a great variety of systems [40] from simple atoms to large organic molecules. In this context, a correct description of IP is crucial for photoemission excited by external fields, in particular by strong fields as it is assumed to be dominated by electrons in the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) [41].…”
Section: Formal Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, we use an average-density self-interaction correction [45]. This formalism is simple and yet reliable for a broad variety of molecules including covalently bound systems [46]. To analyze observables from electronic emission, we apply absorbing boundary conditions following [40,47].…”
Section: On the Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because we refitted the parameters of the Goedecker-like pseudopotential to allow us to use a mesh size of 0.7 a 0 . If we use the original value of the Goedecker pseudopotential [23], we obtain an IP of 11.3 eV [49], much closer to the experimental value. However, that would mean a mesh size twice smaller (0.36 a 0 ), that is huge numerical boxes which represent a great hindrance for the dynamical calculations we present here.…”
Section: Static Properties and Optical Responsementioning
confidence: 84%